Pangolin vs Kubo Cloud: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Pangolin generates $220K in revenue; Kubo Cloud generates $220K. Pangolin and Kubo Cloud are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Pangolin and Kubo Cloud on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  PangolinThis company |  Kubo Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $220K | $220K |
| Team size | 2 | 2 |
| Founded | 2025 | 2018 |
| HQ | San Francisco, United States | United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Pangolin at a glance
Pangolin generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
- Revenue
- $220K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2025
Open-source alternative to Cloudflare Tunnels
Kubo Cloud at a glance
Kubo Cloud generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $220K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2018
Kubo brings you the latest cloud technologies into your business in a private and secure environment. Our strength is in building and operating large scale systems leveraging serverless computing, service mesh, microservices, distributed…
Other Pangolin alternatives
Pangolin competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Pangolin vs Kubo Cloud: frequently asked questions
Is Pangolin or Kubo Cloud bigger?
Pangolin is the bigger company by revenue, at $220K against $220K for Kubo Cloud.
How much revenue does Pangolin make?
Pangolin generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.
How much revenue does Kubo Cloud make?
Kubo Cloud generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.