Latka logo

disguise tech vs Paracosm: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

disguise tech generates $47M in revenue; Paracosm generates $2.1M. disguise tech is 22× bigger than Paracosm by revenue. The table below compares disguise tech and Paracosm on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

disguise tech vs Paracosm compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
Companydisguise tech logodisguise techThis companyParacosm logoParacosm
Revenue$47M$2.1M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$5.5M
Team size1204
Founded20122013
HQUnited KingdomGainesville, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

disguise tech logo

disguise tech at a glance

disguise tech generates $47M in revenue with 120 employees, headquartered in United Kingdom.

Revenue
$47M
Team size
120
Founded
2012

Disguise is a global provider of live event visualization solutions.

Paracosm logo

Paracosm at a glance

Paracosm generates $2.1M in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Gainesville, United States.

Revenue
$2.1M
Funding
$5.5M
Team size
4
Founded
2013

Paracosm develops mobile reality capture, progress monitoring, and visualization solutions to help construction teams build better, faster.

Other disguise tech alternatives

disguise tech competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

disguise tech vs Paracosm: frequently asked questions

Is disguise tech or Paracosm bigger?

disguise tech is the bigger company by revenue, at $47M against $2.1M for Paracosm.

How much revenue does disguise tech make?

disguise tech generates $47M in annual revenue with a team of 120.

How much revenue does Paracosm make?

Paracosm generates $2.1M in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much funding has Paracosm raised?

Paracosm has raised $5.5M in total funding since it was founded in 2013.