CATEX vs Eltes: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
CATEX generates $116.5K in revenue; Eltes generates $113.5K. CATEX and Eltes are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares CATEX and Eltes on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  CATEXThis company |  Eltes |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $116.5K | $113.5K |
| Valuation | $932K | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 83 | 2 |
| Founded | 1994 | 2004 |
| HQ | Princeton, United States | Kasumigaseki, Japan |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
CATEX at a glance
CATEX generates $116.5K in revenue with 83 employees, headquartered in Princeton, United States.
- Revenue
- $116.5K
- Valuation
- $932K
- Team size
- 83
- Founded
- 1994
Developer of Web a based insurance and reinsurance software designed to develop and deploy reinsurance transaction management system. The company's software is used for providing services such as placement and contract management…
Eltes at a glance
Eltes generates $113.5K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Kasumigaseki, Japan.
- Revenue
- $113.5K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2004
Eltes Co Ltd provides consultation services based on digital risk technology for database risk and other large storage protection in Japan. It also offers internal fraud detection services that enable the prevention of information security…
Other CATEX alternatives
CATEX competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
CATEX vs Eltes: frequently asked questions
Is CATEX or Eltes bigger?
CATEX is the bigger company by revenue, at $116.5K against $113.5K for Eltes.
How much revenue does CATEX make?
CATEX generates $116.5K in annual revenue with a team of 83.
How much revenue does Eltes make?
Eltes generates $113.5K in annual revenue with a team of 2.