Latka logo

Emobi vs WorQ: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Emobi generates $1.5M in revenue; WorQ generates $1.5M. Emobi and WorQ are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Emobi and WorQ on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Emobi vs WorQ compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyEmobi logoEmobiThis companyWorQ logoWorQ
Revenue$1.5M$1.5M
Team size10Not disclosed
Founded20202019
HQSan Francisco, United StatesCanberra, Australia

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Emobi logo

Emobi at a glance

Emobi generates $1.5M in revenue with 10 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$1.5M
Team size
10
Founded
2020

The EV charging ecosystem that powers hundreds of businesses with AI

WorQ logo

WorQ at a glance

WorQ generates $1.5M in revenue, headquartered in Canberra, Australia.

Revenue
$1.5M
Founded
2019

Advanced no code, AI integrated platform, with enterprise companies in Utilities, Commonwealth and sdtate government, airports, mining services

Other Emobi alternatives

Emobi competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Emobi vs WorQ: frequently asked questions

Is Emobi or WorQ bigger?

Emobi is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.5M against $1.5M for WorQ.

How much revenue does Emobi make?

Emobi generates $1.5M in annual revenue with a team of 10.

How much revenue does WorQ make?

WorQ generates $1.5M in annual revenue.