Engage2Serve vs Goodtalent: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Engage2Serve generates $5.2M in revenue; Goodtalent generates $5.3M. Goodtalent and Engage2Serve are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Engage2Serve and Goodtalent on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2M | $5.3M |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $37M |
| Team size | 47 | 15 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| HQ | Austin, United States | Swindon, Nigeria |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Engage2Serve at a glance
Engage2Serve generates $5.2M in revenue with 47 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.
- Revenue
- $5.2M
- Team size
- 47
- Founded
- 2014
Student lifecycle management for higher education.
Goodtalent at a glance
Goodtalent generates $5.3M in revenue with 15 employees, headquartered in Swindon, Nigeria.
- Revenue
- $5.3M
- Valuation
- $37M
- Team size
- 15
- Founded
- 2019
HR Software
Other Engage2Serve alternatives
Engage2Serve competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Engage2Serve vs Goodtalent: frequently asked questions
Is Engage2Serve or Goodtalent bigger?
Goodtalent is the bigger company by revenue, at $5.3M against $5.2M for Engage2Serve.
How much revenue does Engage2Serve make?
Engage2Serve generates $5.2M in annual revenue with a team of 47.
How much revenue does Goodtalent make?
Goodtalent generates $5.3M in annual revenue with a team of 15.