EquipmentShare vs OpenRound: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; OpenRound has 1 employees. The table below compares EquipmentShare and OpenRound on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  EquipmentShareThis company |  OpenRound |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 3K | 1 |
| Founded | 2014 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Columbia, United States | London, United Kingdom |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
EquipmentShare at a glance
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.3B
- Team size
- 3K
- Founded
- 2014
Cloud solutions for the construction industry.
OpenRound at a glance
OpenRound has 1 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Team size
- 1
A platform for founders to research and manage investor relationships. Automating catch up reminders and tracking relationships - kill the spreadsheet. Plus a Termsheet visualisation tool to check fundraise modeling and dilution.
Other EquipmentShare alternatives
EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
EquipmentShare vs OpenRound: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.