Latka logo

Chain Technology vs eserv: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Chain Technology generates $2.9M in revenue; eserv generates $6.6M. eserv is 2.3× bigger than Chain Technology by revenue. The table below compares Chain Technology and eserv on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Chain Technology vs eserv compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyChain Technology logoChain TechnologyThis companyeserv logoeserv
Revenue$2.9M$6.6M
Valuation$43M$59.1M
Team size2950
Founded20162015
HQHong Kong, Hong KongAberdeen, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Chain Technology logo

Chain Technology at a glance

Chain Technology generates $2.9M in revenue with 29 employees, headquartered in Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Revenue
$2.9M
Valuation
$43M
Team size
29
Founded
2016

Deliver digital twin & smart construction solution

eserv logo

eserv at a glance

eserv generates $6.6M in revenue with 50 employees, headquartered in Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$6.6M
Valuation
$59.1M
Team size
50
Founded
2015

Eserv has emerged as a premier software-as-a-service (SaaS) provider, revolutionizing the way operating customers conceive, construct, manage, and upkeep complex industrial asset digital twins. Our suite of software solutions and services…

Other Chain Technology alternatives

Chain Technology competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Chain Technology vs eserv: frequently asked questions

Is Chain Technology or eserv bigger?

eserv is the bigger company by revenue, at $6.6M against $2.9M for Chain Technology.

How much revenue does Chain Technology make?

Chain Technology generates $2.9M in annual revenue with a team of 29.

How much revenue does eserv make?

eserv generates $6.6M in annual revenue with a team of 50.