Latka logo

Everseat vs Fitonic: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Everseat generates $284.2K in revenue; Fitonic generates $271.4K. Everseat and Fitonic are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Everseat and Fitonic on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Everseat vs Fitonic compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyEverseat logoEverseatThis companyFitonic logoFitonic
Revenue$284.2K$271.4K
ValuationNot disclosed$2.2M
CustomersNot disclosed36
Team size44
Founded20132012
HQBaltimore, United StatesFribourg, Switzerland

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Everseat logo

Everseat at a glance

Everseat generates $284.2K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Baltimore, United States.

Revenue
$284.2K
Team size
4
Founded
2013

Developer of a medical enterprise platform designed to provide patient self-scheduling and waitlist management services. The company's platform offers a mobile application that solves the supply and demand of imbalance for appointments…

Fitonic logo

Fitonic at a glance

Fitonic generates $271.4K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Fribourg, Switzerland.

Revenue
$271.4K
Valuation
$2.2M
Customers
36
Team size
4
Founded
2012

eHealth, Corporate Health Management, SaaS

Other Everseat alternatives

Everseat competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Everseat vs Fitonic: frequently asked questions

Is Everseat or Fitonic bigger?

Everseat is the bigger company by revenue, at $284.2K against $271.4K for Fitonic.

How much revenue does Everseat make?

Everseat generates $284.2K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does Fitonic make?

Fitonic generates $271.4K in annual revenue with a team of 4.