Aura Vision vs Faceter: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Aura Vision generates $1.3M in revenue; Faceter generates $1.3M. Faceter and Aura Vision are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Aura Vision and Faceter on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Aura VisionThis company |  Faceter |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Valuation | $12.7M | $12.7M |
| Customers | Not disclosed | 100K |
| Team size | 9 | 3 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Pretoria, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Aura Vision at a glance
Aura Vision generates $1.3M in revenue with 9 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $1.3M
- Valuation
- $12.7M
- Team size
- 9
- Founded
- 2019
Visitor analytics for physical retail stores using existing security cameras.
Faceter at a glance
Faceter generates $1.3M in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Pretoria, United States.
- Revenue
- $1.3M
- Valuation
- $12.7M
- Customers
- 100K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2014
Faceter is the first blockchain surveillance system for consumers. Computer vision technology on the blockchain powered by a decentralized network of miners makes the product affordable for all-sized businesses and mass market consumers…
Other Aura Vision alternatives
Aura Vision competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Aura Vision vs Faceter: frequently asked questions
Is Aura Vision or Faceter bigger?
Faceter is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.3M against $1.3M for Aura Vision.
How much revenue does Aura Vision make?
Aura Vision generates $1.3M in annual revenue with a team of 9.
How much revenue does Faceter make?
Faceter generates $1.3M in annual revenue with a team of 3.