Latka logo

Fhoster vs Zagacem: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Fhoster generates $318.8K in revenue; Zagacem generates $313.6K. Fhoster and Zagacem are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Fhoster and Zagacem on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Fhoster vs Zagacem compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyFhoster logoFhosterThis companyZagacem logoZagacem
Revenue$318.8K$313.6K
Valuation$3.2M$70M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$16.7M
Customers30Not disclosed
Team size142
Founded20082013
HQRoma, ItalySan Jose, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Fhoster logo

Fhoster at a glance

Fhoster generates $318.8K in revenue with 14 employees, headquartered in Roma, Italy.

Revenue
$318.8K
Valuation
$3.2M
Customers
30
Team size
14
Founded
2008

Model-driven application platform as a service, Model-driven low-code plattform

Zagacem logo

Zagacem at a glance

Zagacem generates $313.6K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in San Jose, United States.

Revenue
$313.6K
Valuation
$70M
Funding
$16.7M
Team size
2
Founded
2013

To make SMB(small-medium business) cloud software services basic and accessible to all

Other Fhoster alternatives

Fhoster competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Fhoster vs Zagacem: frequently asked questions

Is Fhoster or Zagacem bigger?

Fhoster is the bigger company by revenue, at $318.8K against $313.6K for Zagacem.

How much revenue does Fhoster make?

Fhoster generates $318.8K in annual revenue with a team of 14.

How much revenue does Zagacem make?

Zagacem generates $313.6K in annual revenue with a team of 2.

How much funding has Zagacem raised?

Zagacem has raised $16.7M in total funding since it was founded in 2013.