Fieldmagic vs Project Atlas: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Fieldmagic generates $330K in revenue; Project Atlas generates $363.2K. Project Atlas and Fieldmagic are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Fieldmagic and Project Atlas on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $330K | $363.2K |
| Team size | 3 | 7 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| HQ | Perth, Australia | Dallas, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Fieldmagic at a glance
Fieldmagic generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Perth, Australia.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2017
Fieldmagic is a modern cloud-based field service and asset management platform for site managers, contractors and organisations looking to increase compliance while driving field service efficiency. We believe in designing easy to use, and…
Project Atlas at a glance
Project Atlas generates $363.2K in revenue with 7 employees, headquartered in Dallas, United States.
- Revenue
- $363.2K
- Team size
- 7
- Founded
- 2015
Project Atlas is a mapping engine for construction.
Other Fieldmagic alternatives
Fieldmagic competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Fieldmagic vs Project Atlas: frequently asked questions
Is Fieldmagic or Project Atlas bigger?
Project Atlas is the bigger company by revenue, at $363.2K against $330K for Fieldmagic.
How much revenue does Fieldmagic make?
Fieldmagic generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.
How much revenue does Project Atlas make?
Project Atlas generates $363.2K in annual revenue with a team of 7.