Latka logo

Fluix vs Zuma: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Fluix generates $7.4M in revenue; Zuma generates $7.4M. Zuma and Fluix are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Fluix and Zuma on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Fluix vs Zuma compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyFluix logoFluixThis companyZuma logoZuma
Revenue$7.4M$7.4M
ValuationNot disclosed$52.1M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$7.2M
Team size6761
Founded20142020
HQDublin, IrelandSanta Monica, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Fluix logo

Fluix at a glance

Fluix generates $7.4M in revenue with 67 employees, headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.

Revenue
$7.4M
Team size
67
Founded
2014

Fluix is a mobile-first platform that gives field teams all the tools to work safer, faster, and more efficient.

Zuma logo

Zuma at a glance

Zuma generates $7.4M in revenue with 61 employees, headquartered in Santa Monica, United States.

Revenue
$7.4M
Valuation
$52.1M
Funding
$7.2M
Team size
61
Founded
2020

Sales enablement, SAAS

Other Fluix alternatives

Fluix competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Fluix vs Zuma: frequently asked questions

Is Fluix or Zuma bigger?

Zuma is the bigger company by revenue, at $7.4M against $7.4M for Fluix.

How much revenue does Fluix make?

Fluix generates $7.4M in annual revenue with a team of 67.

How much revenue does Zuma make?

Zuma generates $7.4M in annual revenue with a team of 61.

How much funding has Zuma raised?

Zuma has raised $7.2M in total funding since it was founded in 2020.