Latka logo

GetEmails vs Noki: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

GetEmails generates $4M in revenue; Noki generates $3.9M. GetEmails and Noki are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares GetEmails and Noki on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

GetEmails vs Noki compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyGetEmails logoGetEmailsThis companyNoki logoNoki
Revenue$4M$3.9M
Valuation$25MNot disclosed
Customers750Not disclosed
Team size726
Cash flow$150KNot disclosed
Founded20192021
HQUnited StatesLondon, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

GetEmails logo

GetEmails at a glance

GetEmails generates $4M in revenue with 7 employees, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$4M
Valuation
$25M
Customers
750
Team size
7
Founded
2019

GetEmails is a bootstrapped identity-resolution software company founded in November 2019 and headquartered in Austin, Texas. The platform identifies anonymous website visitors and delivers plain-text email addresses directly to clients…

Noki logo

Noki at a glance

Noki generates $3.9M in revenue with 26 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$3.9M
Team size
26
Founded
2021

Powering the leading B2B Databases, Buyer Intent and Market Research Platforms with Custom AI Signals

Other GetEmails alternatives

GetEmails competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

GetEmails vs Noki: frequently asked questions

Is GetEmails or Noki bigger?

GetEmails is the bigger company by revenue, at $4M against $3.9M for Noki.

How much revenue does GetEmails make?

GetEmails generates $4M in annual revenue with a team of 7.

How much revenue does Noki make?

Noki generates $3.9M in annual revenue with a team of 26.