Latka logo

Gradient Labs vs Workhint: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Gradient Labs generates $220K in revenue; Workhint generates $220K. Gradient Labs and Workhint are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Gradient Labs and Workhint on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Gradient Labs vs Workhint compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyGradient Labs logoGradient LabsThis companyWorkhint logoWorkhint
Revenue$220K$220K
Team size22
Founded20242019
HQLondon, United KingdomUnited States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Gradient Labs logo

Gradient Labs at a glance

Gradient Labs generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$220K
Team size
2
Founded
2024

We turn AI from impressive demos into impressive results. Our clients maintain complete control of their systems while achieving real efficiency gains. For example, we've helped healthcare providers cut processing time by 66% and scale…

Workhint logo

Workhint at a glance

Workhint generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$220K
Team size
2
Founded
2019

WorkHint is a software to manage on-demand contract talents, consultants, or freelancers.

Other Gradient Labs alternatives

Gradient Labs competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Gradient Labs vs Workhint: frequently asked questions

Is Gradient Labs or Workhint bigger?

Gradient Labs is the bigger company by revenue, at $220K against $220K for Workhint.

How much revenue does Gradient Labs make?

Gradient Labs generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.

How much revenue does Workhint make?

Workhint generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.