Latka logo

Hopps vs WorQ: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Hopps generates $1.5M in revenue; WorQ generates $1.5M. Hopps and WorQ are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Hopps and WorQ on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Hopps vs WorQ compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyHopps logoHoppsThis companyWorQ logoWorQ
Revenue$1.5M$1.5M
Valuation$4MNot disclosed
Funding raised$775KNot disclosed
Customers10KNot disclosed
Team size43Not disclosed
Founded20192019
HQLos Angeles, United StatesCanberra, Australia

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Hopps logo

Hopps at a glance

Hopps generates $1.5M in revenue with 43 employees, headquartered in Los Angeles, United States.

Revenue
$1.5M
Valuation
$4M
Funding
$775K
Customers
10K
Team size
43
Founded
2019

An instant and on-demand expert collaboration and upskilling platform for enterprise teams.

WorQ logo

WorQ at a glance

WorQ generates $1.5M in revenue, headquartered in Canberra, Australia.

Revenue
$1.5M
Founded
2019

Advanced no code, AI integrated platform, with enterprise companies in Utilities, Commonwealth and sdtate government, airports, mining services

Other Hopps alternatives

Hopps competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Hopps vs WorQ: frequently asked questions

Is Hopps or WorQ bigger?

Hopps is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.5M against $1.5M for WorQ.

How much revenue does Hopps make?

Hopps generates $1.5M in annual revenue with a team of 43.

How much revenue does WorQ make?

WorQ generates $1.5M in annual revenue.

How much funding has Hopps raised?

Hopps has raised $775K in total funding since it was founded in 2019.