Latka logo

ATA RiskStation vs HubNami: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

ATA RiskStation generates $163.2K in revenue; HubNami generates $167.5K. HubNami and ATA RiskStation are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares ATA RiskStation and HubNami on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

ATA RiskStation vs HubNami compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyATA RiskStation logoATA RiskStationThis companyHubNami logoHubNami
Revenue$163.2K$167.5K
Team size82
Founded20062014
HQDallas, United StatesSan Francisco, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

ATA RiskStation logo

ATA RiskStation at a glance

ATA RiskStation generates $163.2K in revenue with 8 employees, headquartered in Dallas, United States.

Revenue
$163.2K
Team size
8
Founded
2006

Provider of cloud-based portfolio risk analytic services intended to improve efficiency and reduce costs. The company's risk management services use multi-model, multi-parameter and multi-timeframe approach to deliver intuitive web…

HubNami logo

HubNami at a glance

HubNami generates $167.5K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$167.5K
Team size
2
Founded
2014

Social Media Analytics

Other ATA RiskStation alternatives

ATA RiskStation competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

ATA RiskStation vs HubNami: frequently asked questions

Is ATA RiskStation or HubNami bigger?

HubNami is the bigger company by revenue, at $167.5K against $163.2K for ATA RiskStation.

How much revenue does ATA RiskStation make?

ATA RiskStation generates $163.2K in annual revenue with a team of 8.

How much revenue does HubNami make?

HubNami generates $167.5K in annual revenue with a team of 2.