Latka logo

iCentera vs Thorntale: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

iCentera generates $360.8K in revenue; Thorntale generates $330K. iCentera and Thorntale are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares iCentera and Thorntale on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

iCentera vs Thorntale compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyiCentera logoiCenteraThis companyThorntale logoThorntale
Revenue$360.8K$330K
Customers180KNot disclosed
Team size63
Founded20032024
HQBurnsville, United StatesSan Francisco, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

iCentera logo

iCentera at a glance

iCentera generates $360.8K in revenue with 6 employees, headquartered in Burnsville, United States.

Revenue
$360.8K
Customers
180K
Team size
6
Founded
2003

Provider of on-demand portal software solutions, content management and analytics for enterprise sales enablement. The company offer business users to create intranet sales portals, extranet channel partner portals, customer portals and…

Thorntale logo

Thorntale at a glance

Thorntale generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$330K
Team size
3
Founded
2024

Easiest way for post-sales teams to create data-driven presentations

Other iCentera alternatives

iCentera competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

iCentera vs Thorntale: frequently asked questions

Is iCentera or Thorntale bigger?

iCentera is the bigger company by revenue, at $360.8K against $330K for Thorntale.

How much revenue does iCentera make?

iCentera generates $360.8K in annual revenue with a team of 6.

How much revenue does Thorntale make?

Thorntale generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.