Interactive Health Technologies vs MedArkive: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Interactive Health Technologies generates $770K in revenue; MedArkive generates $151.7K. Interactive Health Technologies is 5.1× bigger than MedArkive by revenue. The table below compares Interactive Health Technologies and MedArkive on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Interactive Health TechnologiesThis company |  MedArkive |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $770K | $151.7K |
| Team size | 7 | 9 |
| Founded | 2011 | 2013 |
| HQ | Austin, United States | London, United Kingdom |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Interactive Health Technologies at a glance
Interactive Health Technologies generates $770K in revenue with 7 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.
- Revenue
- $770K
- Team size
- 7
- Founded
- 2011
Heart rate monitoring software for schools
MedArkive at a glance
MedArkive generates $151.7K in revenue with 9 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $151.7K
- Team size
- 9
- Founded
- 2013
MedArkive is a SaaS pharma educational Content.
Other Interactive Health Technologies alternatives
Interactive Health Technologies competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Interactive Health Technologies vs MedArkive: frequently asked questions
Is Interactive Health Technologies or MedArkive bigger?
Interactive Health Technologies is the bigger company by revenue, at $770K against $151.7K for MedArkive.
How much revenue does Interactive Health Technologies make?
Interactive Health Technologies generates $770K in annual revenue with a team of 7.
How much revenue does MedArkive make?
MedArkive generates $151.7K in annual revenue with a team of 9.