Infolinx vs ShapeDiver: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Infolinx generates $1.4M in revenue; ShapeDiver generates $1.4M. Infolinx and ShapeDiver are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Infolinx and ShapeDiver on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Team size | 13 | 13 |
| Founded | 1987 | 2015 |
| HQ | Kensington, United States | Vienna, Austria |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Infolinx at a glance
Infolinx generates $1.4M in revenue with 13 employees, headquartered in Kensington, United States.
- Revenue
- $1.4M
- Team size
- 13
- Founded
- 1987
Infolinx records and information management software enables organizations to easily manage the complete lifecycle of physical and digital records. From record creation to disposition, Infolinx provides a streamlined solution for managing…
ShapeDiver at a glance
ShapeDiver generates $1.4M in revenue with 13 employees, headquartered in Vienna, Austria.
- Revenue
- $1.4M
- Team size
- 13
- Founded
- 2015
ShapeDiver is a self-service, cloud-native, SaaS platform that helps individuals and businesses build applications based on parametric CAD models made with Rhinoceros 3D and Grasshopper. Our clients use our technology to create very…
Other Infolinx alternatives
Infolinx competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Infolinx vs ShapeDiver: frequently asked questions
Is Infolinx or ShapeDiver bigger?
Infolinx is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.4M against $1.4M for ShapeDiver.
How much revenue does Infolinx make?
Infolinx generates $1.4M in annual revenue with a team of 13.
How much revenue does ShapeDiver make?
ShapeDiver generates $1.4M in annual revenue with a team of 13.