Latka logo

Elastic Suite vs Infolio: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Elastic Suite generates $7.5M in revenue; Infolio generates $7.5M. Infolio and Elastic Suite are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Elastic Suite and Infolio on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Elastic Suite vs Infolio compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyElastic Suite logoElastic SuiteThis companyInfolio logoInfolio
Revenue$7.5M$7.5M
CustomersNot disclosed40K
Team size68142
Founded20002014
HQDenver, United StatesLondon, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Elastic Suite logo

Elastic Suite at a glance

Elastic Suite generates $7.5M in revenue with 68 employees, headquartered in Denver, United States.

Revenue
$7.5M
Team size
68
Founded
2000

Trusted by world-class brands everywhere. Elastic is a next-generation B2B ecommerce and digital merchandising solution that will transform your wholesale business. Brands that love Elastic are realizing measurable cost savings, an…

Infolio logo

Infolio at a glance

Infolio generates $7.5M in revenue with 142 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$7.5M
Customers
40K
Team size
142
Founded
2014

All-in-one project collaboration suite

Other Elastic Suite alternatives

Elastic Suite competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Elastic Suite vs Infolio: frequently asked questions

Is Elastic Suite or Infolio bigger?

Infolio is the bigger company by revenue, at $7.5M against $7.5M for Elastic Suite.

How much revenue does Elastic Suite make?

Elastic Suite generates $7.5M in annual revenue with a team of 68.

How much revenue does Infolio make?

Infolio generates $7.5M in annual revenue with a team of 142.