InStream vs Sutherland: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
InStream has 63 employees; Sutherland generates $8B. The table below compares InStream and Sutherland on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  InStreamThis company |  Sutherland |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Not disclosed | $8B |
| Team size | 63 | 52.9K |
| Founded | 2004 | 1986 |
| HQ | Nashville, United States | Fairport, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
InStream at a glance
InStream has 63 employees, headquartered in Nashville, United States.
- Team size
- 63
- Founded
- 2004
Headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, InStream provides organizations big and small with effective workplace technology, enhanced business processes, and automation as well as overall workflow solutions. Since its launch in 2004, InStream…
Sutherland at a glance
Sutherland generates $8B in revenue with 52.9K employees, headquartered in Fairport, United States.
- Revenue
- $8B
- Team size
- 52.9K
- Founded
- 1986
Sutherland is a business process transformation company that rethinks & rebuilds business processes for the digital age. Learn more here.
Other InStream alternatives
InStream competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
InStream vs Sutherland: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does Sutherland make?
Sutherland generates $8B in annual revenue with a team of 52.9K.