Invoice Meister vs ServiceFolder: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Invoice Meister generates $220K in revenue; ServiceFolder generates $220K. Invoice Meister and ServiceFolder are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Invoice Meister and ServiceFolder on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $220K | $220K |
| Team size | 2 | 2 |
| Founded | 2017 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Bloomingdale, United States | Bengaluru, India |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Invoice Meister at a glance
Invoice Meister generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Bloomingdale, United States.
- Revenue
- $220K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2017
Online invoicing software for your small business. Send online invoices, get paid instantly and know your numbers in real time!
ServiceFolder at a glance
ServiceFolder generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Bengaluru, India.
- Revenue
- $220K
- Team size
- 2
ServiceFolder is the most robust field service management tool for your unorganized small business. The main aim of the ServiceFolder is to provide a web and mobile application tool with no match in performance, execution, security…
Other Invoice Meister alternatives
Invoice Meister competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Invoice Meister vs ServiceFolder: frequently asked questions
Is Invoice Meister or ServiceFolder bigger?
Invoice Meister is the bigger company by revenue, at $220K against $220K for ServiceFolder.
How much revenue does Invoice Meister make?
Invoice Meister generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.
How much revenue does ServiceFolder make?
ServiceFolder generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.