Foresoft vs JMango360: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Foresoft generates $5.9M in revenue; JMango360 generates $5.8M. Foresoft and JMango360 are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Foresoft and JMango360 on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  ForesoftThis company |  JMango360 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.9M | $5.8M |
| Team size | 1 | 53 |
| Founded | 2001 | 2011 |
| HQ | Long Grove, United States | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Foresoft at a glance
Foresoft generates $5.9M in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Long Grove, United States.
- Revenue
- $5.9M
- Team size
- 1
- Founded
- 2001
ForeSoft Corporation, Chicago, IL, based company is an application service provider, offering web-based cutting edge technology solutions for database applications, project management and customer support automation.
JMango360 at a glance
JMango360 generates $5.8M in revenue with 53 employees, headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Revenue
- $5.8M
- Team size
- 53
- Founded
- 2011
JMango360 is the one-stop-shop to maximize your mobile results. Our proven open SaaS-solution is designed to avoid expensive custom app development. We build a best-in-class mobile app that reflects your brand, live within weeks. Where…
Other Foresoft alternatives
Foresoft competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Foresoft vs JMango360: frequently asked questions
Is Foresoft or JMango360 bigger?
Foresoft is the bigger company by revenue, at $5.9M against $5.8M for JMango360.
How much revenue does Foresoft make?
Foresoft generates $5.9M in annual revenue with a team of 1.
How much revenue does JMango360 make?
JMango360 generates $5.8M in annual revenue with a team of 53.