Latka logo

Jumpcut vs StreamScience: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Jumpcut generates $1.7M in revenue; StreamScience generates $1.6M. Jumpcut and StreamScience are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Jumpcut and StreamScience on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Jumpcut vs StreamScience compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyJumpcut logoJumpcutThis companyStreamScience logoStreamScience
Revenue$1.7M$1.6M
Team size1119
Founded20142011
HQLos Angeles, United StatesBengaluru, India

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Jumpcut logo

Jumpcut at a glance

Jumpcut generates $1.7M in revenue with 11 employees, headquartered in Los Angeles, United States.

Revenue
$1.7M
Team size
11
Founded
2014

Helping creators go viral and build businesses.

StreamScience logo

StreamScience at a glance

StreamScience generates $1.6M in revenue with 19 employees, headquartered in Bengaluru, India.

Revenue
$1.6M
Team size
19
Founded
2011

We help social media users with what to say, when to say it. We suggest the best hashtags and best send times to maximise the effect of your message.

Other Jumpcut alternatives

Jumpcut competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Jumpcut vs StreamScience: frequently asked questions

Is Jumpcut or StreamScience bigger?

Jumpcut is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.7M against $1.6M for StreamScience.

How much revenue does Jumpcut make?

Jumpcut generates $1.7M in annual revenue with a team of 11.

How much revenue does StreamScience make?

StreamScience generates $1.6M in annual revenue with a team of 19.