Latka logo

Kato vs PukkaTeam: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Kato generates $87.5K in revenue; PukkaTeam generates $116.5K. PukkaTeam is 1.3× bigger than Kato by revenue. The table below compares Kato and PukkaTeam on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Kato vs PukkaTeam compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyKato logoKatoThis companyPukkaTeam logoPukkaTeam
Revenue$87.5K$116.5K
ValuationNot disclosed$699K
Team size42
Founded20132008
HQOakland, United StatesShropshire, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Kato logo

Kato at a glance

Kato generates $87.5K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Oakland, United States.

Revenue
$87.5K
Team size
4
Founded
2013

Provider of chatting tools. The company offers a messaging platform that provides real time and asynchronous communication on desktop, tablets and mobiles.

PukkaTeam logo

PukkaTeam at a glance

PukkaTeam generates $116.5K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Shropshire, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$116.5K
Valuation
$699K
Team size
2
Founded
2008

Developer of a workplace application designed to connect distributed team members and facilitate real-time communication while working away from the team. The company's software keeps remote team members connected recreating the office…

Other Kato alternatives

Kato competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Kato vs PukkaTeam: frequently asked questions

Is Kato or PukkaTeam bigger?

PukkaTeam is the bigger company by revenue, at $116.5K against $87.5K for Kato.

How much revenue does Kato make?

Kato generates $87.5K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does PukkaTeam make?

PukkaTeam generates $116.5K in annual revenue with a team of 2.