Kato vs Run Shift Run: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Kato generates $87.5K in revenue; Run Shift Run generates $102.3K. Run Shift Run is 1.2× bigger than Kato by revenue. The table below compares Kato and Run Shift Run on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  KatoThis company |  Run Shift Run |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $87.5K | $102.3K |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $511.5K |
| Team size | 4 | 2 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| HQ | Oakland, United States | Wake Forest, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Kato at a glance
Kato generates $87.5K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Oakland, United States.
- Revenue
- $87.5K
- Team size
- 4
- Founded
- 2013
Provider of chatting tools. The company offers a messaging platform that provides real time and asynchronous communication on desktop, tablets and mobiles.
Run Shift Run at a glance
Run Shift Run generates $102.3K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Wake Forest, United States.
- Revenue
- $102.3K
- Valuation
- $511.5K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2016
Run Shift Run is a company that provides hotel staff communication and hotel management software solutions.
Other Kato alternatives
Kato competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Kato vs Run Shift Run: frequently asked questions
Is Kato or Run Shift Run bigger?
Run Shift Run is the bigger company by revenue, at $102.3K against $87.5K for Kato.
How much revenue does Kato make?
Kato generates $87.5K in annual revenue with a team of 4.
How much revenue does Run Shift Run make?
Run Shift Run generates $102.3K in annual revenue with a team of 2.