Latka logo

KIT-AR vs Tread: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

KIT-AR generates $5.9M in revenue; Tread generates $5.9M. KIT-AR and Tread are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares KIT-AR and Tread on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

KIT-AR vs Tread compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyKIT-AR logoKIT-ARThis companyTread logoTread
Revenue$5.9M$5.9M
ValuationNot disclosed$35.2M
Team size2240
Founded20182016
HQLondon, United KingdomToronto, Canada

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

KIT-AR logo

KIT-AR at a glance

KIT-AR generates $5.9M in revenue with 22 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$5.9M
Team size
22
Founded
2018

Developer of a quality assurance platform intended to increase manufacturing productivity and improve automotive quality assurance using augmented reality.

Tread logo

Tread at a glance

Tread generates $5.9M in revenue with 40 employees, headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Revenue
$5.9M
Valuation
$35.2M
Team size
40
Founded
2016

Developer of a construction management platform designed to hire equipment operating subcontractors easily. The company's platform uses data analytics to keep construction moving and serves as a bridge between heavy equipment operators and…

Other KIT-AR alternatives

KIT-AR competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

KIT-AR vs Tread: frequently asked questions

Is KIT-AR or Tread bigger?

KIT-AR is the bigger company by revenue, at $5.9M against $5.9M for Tread.

How much revenue does KIT-AR make?

KIT-AR generates $5.9M in annual revenue with a team of 22.

How much revenue does Tread make?

Tread generates $5.9M in annual revenue with a team of 40.