Latka logo

Kosmik vs Shimo Docs: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Kosmik generates $66.3K in revenue; Shimo Docs generates $77.7K. Shimo Docs is 1.2× bigger than Kosmik by revenue. The table below compares Kosmik and Shimo Docs on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Kosmik vs Shimo Docs compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyKosmik logoKosmikThis companyShimo Docs logoShimo Docs
Revenue$66.3K$77.7K
Valuation$397.9KNot disclosed
Team size192
Founded20172014
HQParis, FranceBeijing, China

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Kosmik logo

Kosmik at a glance

Kosmik generates $66.3K in revenue with 19 employees, headquartered in Paris, France.

Revenue
$66.3K
Valuation
$397.9K
Team size
19
Founded
2017

Kosmik is a visual collaboration platform. Kosmik is based around a zooming user interface where you can store and edit any type of data.

Shimo Docs logo

Shimo Docs at a glance

Shimo Docs generates $77.7K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Beijing, China.

Revenue
$77.7K
Team size
2
Founded
2014

Developer of an online collaborative office software designed to store and manage documents in the cloud. The company's software combines chat, documents, spreadsheets and more in a simple interface similar to Google Docs, enabling users…

Other Kosmik alternatives

Kosmik competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Kosmik vs Shimo Docs: frequently asked questions

Is Kosmik or Shimo Docs bigger?

Shimo Docs is the bigger company by revenue, at $77.7K against $66.3K for Kosmik.

How much revenue does Kosmik make?

Kosmik generates $66.3K in annual revenue with a team of 19.

How much revenue does Shimo Docs make?

Shimo Docs generates $77.7K in annual revenue with a team of 2.