Latka logo

Kosmik vs SweetHive: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Kosmik generates $66.3K in revenue; SweetHive generates $72.6K. SweetHive and Kosmik are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Kosmik and SweetHive on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Kosmik vs SweetHive compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyKosmik logoKosmikThis companySweetHive logoSweetHive
Revenue$66.3K$72.6K
Valuation$397.9K$507.9K
Team size192
Founded20172014
HQParis, FranceMilano, Italy

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Kosmik logo

Kosmik at a glance

Kosmik generates $66.3K in revenue with 19 employees, headquartered in Paris, France.

Revenue
$66.3K
Valuation
$397.9K
Team size
19
Founded
2017

Kosmik is a visual collaboration platform. Kosmik is based around a zooming user interface where you can store and edit any type of data.

SweetHive logo

SweetHive at a glance

SweetHive generates $72.6K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Milano, Italy.

Revenue
$72.6K
Valuation
$507.9K
Team size
2
Founded
2014

SweetHive is a SaaS collaborative platform designed for organisations, solving common problems of team collaboration platforms like chats proliferation. Its design allows Multi-level collaboration based on new features like process…

Other Kosmik alternatives

Kosmik competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Kosmik vs SweetHive: frequently asked questions

Is Kosmik or SweetHive bigger?

SweetHive is the bigger company by revenue, at $72.6K against $66.3K for Kosmik.

How much revenue does Kosmik make?

Kosmik generates $66.3K in annual revenue with a team of 19.

How much revenue does SweetHive make?

SweetHive generates $72.6K in annual revenue with a team of 2.