Founder Interview
How LendingPoint Reached $330M Net Revenue and 300,000 Customers While Staying Profitable (Interview with Founder Tom Burnside)
- Interview Date
- April 5, 2022
- Interviewee
- Tom BurnsideFounder
Company Metrics at Interview Time
Net Revenue (2021)
$330M
Active Customers (2022)
300,000
Capital Deployed (2021)
$2.1B
Average Loan Size (2022)
$11,000
Net Promoter Score (2022)
86
Historical Snapshot
These numbers were reported by Tom Burnside during his interview with Nathan Latka recorded in April 2022 and represent a historical snapshot, not current figures. See LendingPoint’s current numbers.

Key Takeaways
- 01LendingPoint generated $330M in net revenue in 2021, after paying all warehouse and capital providers.
- 02The company deployed $2.1B in loans in 2021, up from just under $1B in 2020.
- 03LendingPoint had over 300,000 active borrowers and had serviced approximately 450,000 in total as of early 2022.
- 04Average loan size grew from $5,000 at founding in 2014 to $11,000 by 2022.
- 0525 to 30% of the active loan base consists of renewal customers returning for additional loans.
- 06The company crossed $500M in annual originations in 2019, a key threshold for better capital pricing.
- 07Warburg Pincus put $175M into LendingPoint during COVID, the company's first institutional round, with zero secondary and all of it reinvested in growth.
- 08The company started with $15M in loans originated in its first year, 2014, at a 10% cost of funds.
- 09LendingPoint has 400 distinct pricing points across five credit grade buckets, powered by AI models.
- 10The company reported an 86 net promoter score reflecting strong borrower satisfaction.
Company Metrics at Time of Interview
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Net Revenue (2021) | $330M | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Capital Deployed (2021) | $2.1B | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Capital Deployed (Q1 2022) | $900M | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Capital Deployed (COVID year) (2020) | just under $1B | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Active Customers (2022) | 300,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Total Customers Serviced (2022) | 450,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Average Loan Size (2014) | $5,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Average Loan Size (2022) | $11,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Loans Originated (2014) | $15M | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Loans Originated (2018) | $360M | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Annual Originations Threshold for Better Pricing (2019) | $500M | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Debt Capacity (current) (2022) | $1B to $1.5B | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Renewal Share of Active Base (2022) | 25 to 30% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Net Promoter Score (2022) | 86 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Cost of Funds (initial) (2014) | 10% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Cost of Funds (2018) | 8% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Weighted Average Coupon (early loans) (2014) | 22 to 23% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Warrants Given Up (first year) (2014) | 1% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Pricing Points (2022) | 400 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Credit Grade Buckets (2022) | 5 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Warburg Pincus Investment | $175M | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Secondary Proceeds (2022) | $0 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Year Founded | 2014 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| CFO Hired | 2019 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
Growth Breakdown
Revenue
LendingPoint reported $330M in net revenue for 2021 — $333.3M precisely — which Tom Burnside confirmed is net of all warehouse and capital provider costs. He projected roughly $600M for 2022.
Loan Volume
Separately from revenue, the company originated $15M in loans in its first year, 2014, grew to $360M in 2018, closed a little under $1B in 2020, and deployed $2.1B in 2021, with almost $900M in Q1 2022 alone.
Customers
As of early 2022, LendingPoint had just over 300,000 active borrowers and had serviced approximately 450,000 in total. The average loan size grew from $5,000 at founding to $11,000 by 2022, and 25 to 30% of the active base consists of returning renewal customers.
Team and Operations
Tom Burnside noted the leadership team had worked together across at least two to three prior companies, providing deep institutional knowledge. The current CFO joined in 2019. The company operates across direct-to-consumer, point-of-sale home improvement, medical, and small business e-commerce lending channels.
Profitability and Funding
LendingPoint is profitable and has taken only one institutional equity round, a $175M investment from Warburg Pincus that came in during COVID with zero secondary proceeds. Prior to that, the team funded the business with friends-and-family capital raised across four or five tranches — a mix of equity and mezzanine — with no outside institutional round until 2020.
Growth Strategy
AI-Driven Credit and Pricing Models
LendingPoint built proprietary AI models that predict borrower risk and assign pricing across five credit grade buckets and 400 distinct pricing points. Tom Burnside credited these models with driving down loss rates, improving advance rates from capital providers, and enabling the company to expand its credit box from near-prime borrowers to the full 550 to 850 FICO range.
Renewal and Retention Focus
The company prioritized borrower experience to drive repeat business, achieving an 86 net promoter score. Approximately 25 to 30% of the active loan base at any time consists of customers renewing or taking a second loan, which Burnside described as the primary lever for reducing customer acquisition cost over time.
Capital Efficiency and Warehouse Optimization
LendingPoint started by using its own equity on the balance sheet to test models before approaching institutional lenders. Once it crossed roughly $100M in cumulative transactions, capital providers offered better advance rates and pricing, and cost of funds came down from about 10% at founding to about 8% by 2018. Burnside said pricing does not improve at real scale until a lender crosses $500M in originations a year, a threshold LendingPoint hit in 2019.
Product Expansion into Point-of-Sale and Small Business
LendingPoint acquired a point-of-sale company to enter home improvement and medical lending, enabling seven to ten year loan terms and a new merchant channel. The company also expanded into small business e-commerce lending, helping merchants finance inventory purchases, diversifying origination sources beyond direct-to-consumer.
Platform Optionality for Capital Markets
Rather than relying on a single funding structure, LendingPoint built a platform that services banks, credit unions, ABS structures, forward flows, and its own balance sheet simultaneously. Burnside said this optionality allows the company to price aggressively and offer the right product at the right time regardless of market conditions.
Best Quotes
“We started in that really that six sixty and under space just so we could try to understand them, give them a reasonable price and reasonable product and tell their story in a way that nobody else was telling it.”
“We have an 86 net promoter score. We work really hard on our customer to make sure that our customer is having a great experience because if they have a great experience, they come back.”
“The average transaction today is about 11,000, right? So it's moved from the five thousand days to about 11,000 today.”
“We went to $2,100,000,000 in 2021, which is a huge growth. We slowed down a little bit during COVID in 2020, but then we had just significant, of closed a little under 1,000,000,000, then went to 2,100,000,000.”
“In 2021, we were at about $330,000,000. This is basically this is our this is our net revenue.”
“We can easily get to a billion to billion 5 with what we have right now. It's a combination of warehouses, ABSs, forward flows, bank commitments, things of that sort that make that happen.”
“We're making money. We'll make 100 plus this year.”
“Warburg was the first institutional round that we've taken. And they've been amazing partners. Like they have been really, really good.”
“They put in a $175,000,000 now themselves into the company.”
What Happened Next
This interview captured LendingPoint at a moment of rapid scaling in April 2022, with $330M in 2021 net revenue, 300,000 active borrowers, and $900M already deployed in Q1 2022 alone. The figures here are a point-in-time snapshot reported by Tom Burnside and do not reflect the company’s current performance. Visit the LendingPoint company profile on GetLatka for the most recent available data and any updates since this recording.
View LendingPoint’s current profile and metricsFull Transcript
Chapters
- 0:00Introduction and Company Overview
- 0:36Founding Story and Market Opportunity in 2014
- 1:43Early Loan Product: Size, Credit Score, and Terms
- 6:08Loan Terms, Interest Rates, and Repayment
- 9:07Securing Initial Capital and Cost of Funds
- 13:20Year One: $15M in Loans and Early Learnings
- 14:13Growth to 2018: $360M Originated and Capital Expansion
- 15:03Crossing $500M in Originations and Pricing Inflection
- 16:342021 Capital Deployed of $2.1B and Q1 2022
- 17:362021 Net Revenue of $330M
- 19:28300,000 Customers and $11,000 Average Loan Size
- 19:57Point-of-Sale Acquisition and Product Diversification
- 22:23Current Debt Capacity and Competitive Positioning
- 23:02Valuation Discussion and Profitability
- 25:05Warburg Pincus Partnership and Zero Secondary
- 26:30Retaining Early Employees and Future Liquidity
- 27:09Famous Five Rapid Fire Questions
Introduction and Company Overview
Nathan Latka
00:00Hey, folks. My guest today is Tom Burnside. He is leading lendingpoint.com, an AI driven credit tech lending platform. He sees the company as a way to do well and do good simultaneously by protecting, nourishing, and growing each consumer's financial future. He does this with over twenty five years of experience and a wealth of industry knowledge prior to lendingpoint. He's an accomplished credit and financial services leader and trusted data scientist. Tom leads the rest of the team
00:24in serving their borrowers, their originating financial institutions, their merchants, and other service providers while delivering predictable returns to their capital market providers. Tom, you ready to take us to the top?
Tom Burnside
00:35>> We are.
Nathan Latka
00:35All right.
Founding Story and Market Opportunity in 2014
Nathan Latka
00:36So what gave you this idea? Think back in '20 Was it 2013, the start date?
Tom Burnside
00:41>> Well, was 2014, the end of twenty fourteen, really started funding in 2015. What gave us an opportunity is what we were looking at was at a marketplace that was serving some of the credit bands well, really kind of the assets that other banks otherwise would buy. What we saw was an opportunity for kind of the more challenged credits to start there, understand that, do it really well through AI, and then continue to broaden our funnel. And
01:06>> so today, fund all credit bands from five fifty all the way up to eight fifty. But we started in that really that six sixty and under space just so we could try to understand them, give them a reasonable price and reasonable product and tell their story in a way that nobody else was telling it.
Nathan Latka
01:23So these are folks, if you're listening and you're doing $50,000 a year in annual revenue and you want to take out a, what, a $5,000 loan, Tom, something like that, that can check out your offer.
Tom Burnside
01:32>> Yeah, $5,000 now that that market goes all the way up to $50,000 So as we've got better on the marketing and the better on the understanding of the customer, we've been able to expand the offers.
Early Loan Product: Size, Credit Score, and Terms
Nathan Latka
01:43Did you, sorry, what did you start with though? What was your initial sort of target offer size in 2014?
Tom Burnside
01:47>> It was about 5,000. It was about 5,000, very beginning, start at 5,000.
Nathan Latka
01:50So that was your sort of thesis. And then it scaled from there. Guess take me back to one of those early deals. So I'm a consumer, you said a credit score above what?
Tom Burnside
02:00>> So typically in the early days, that credit score would be around 620, 625, maybe in that area.
Nathan Latka
02:06Then what might that offer look like?
Tom Burnside
02:08>> Well, was either somebody that was likely, had light credit footprint, they were just getting established and nobody could really kind of put all the other kind of API and data information together to be able to tell their story. So there's a lot of other things that you would look at outside of just credit. You might look at phone bills, you might look at rent history, you might look at some other things to tell the story of
02:26>> their willingness to pay, right? Or their ability to pay. And so those are the things we really focused on. We focused on, I mean, of the problems you always have is fraud and we focused a lot on KYC, know your customer. And we were able to get a very predictive outcome on those predictor scores. This was typically somebody that was either on the way back up, had gone through a dip or just had a very light
02:47>> credit footprint.
Nathan Latka
02:49And today, even back then in your pro formas when you're building in sort of a charge off or a losses or bad debt expense, is this 2%, 3%, four percent? What do you build in as a buffer?
Tom Burnside
03:00>> Well, really what you're doing is the AI models have done an amazing job of predicting risk. And so the way that the AI models work today is it predicts risk, puts you in a category, and then tells me, okay, basically here's what the risks are going to be. But then pricing is the next kind of optimization tool that we use. And we have about five different buckets of credit grades or risk, right? And we now are
03:24>> up to 400 different pricing points with inside of those grids. So we are getting really, really good at giving you the right product at the right time at the right place with the right terms and conditions that you can understand how affordable it is for you to finish a project or resolve some consolidation of bills or whatever it is that you need to do.
Nathan Latka
03:45Oh, what's going on there, YouTube? Good to see you guys. Now imagine this, you love watching these interviews with SaaS founders, but imagine if we took all of the valuation data out from over 2,807 interviews I've done manually saves you a lot of time. Well, we've done this. We've built it into the beautiful interface inside of Founderpath. Check this out. I'll show you how you can access this in a second. But you log in, you connect
04:08your Stripe account, you see your valuation real time. You can see what it changed over the past eighty eight days and even set goals for valuation this year. Now the secret evaluation is there's many different ways to value a SaaS business. So the reason you're gonna see three or four different valuations inside of your Founderpath dashboard, this is all free by the way, is because depending on who's doing the buying of your SaaS company, you're gonna
04:33get a different valuation. A VC is gonna pay a different valuation. Private equity firm is different. If you're gonna do a minority sale, that's different. And if you sell the whole business, that's a different valuation. You can see all those when I hover over here. Right? So the teal is what a VC would pay. Yellow is what private equity And red is if you sold the whole thing outright. Now what's cool about this is this is
04:54not built off random data. Again, you guys hear these interviews on YouTube. All these datas are built from real time valuation data points founder share with us on the show. So traction 1,200,000 seed round 3.7 raise. They sold 22% of their business. Go in here and filter by the event. Maybe you only wanna see companies that have sold the whole business. Well, here are a bunch that have been acquired the valuation and the multiple. Maybe you're
05:20going out right now and you're raising your seed round. We'll go in here and look at all this recent seed deals that went down, what they raised, what valuation they raised at and what percent that they sold. There's never been a larger dataset of SaaS valuations than what you can get now inside of Founderpath. And we're thrilled to bring it to you. All right, we're gonna go back to the YouTube video here in a second, but
05:42if you wanna check this tool out, if you wanna jump in and sign up, you can check it out for free to get your valuation at this link. This link, founderpath.com/products/valuations. Or if you go to founderpath.com and hover over products, click on get your valuation here, and go ahead and sign up to give it a whirl. Again, all that valuation data live right inside the platform. I hope to see you there. Alright. Let's jump back into
Loan Terms, Interest Rates, and Repayment
Nathan Latka
06:08the interview. So let's go stay in 2014 before because you've had a lot of growth. Let's stay in 2014 though for another minute or two. I take I'm one of your first customers. I have a 650 score, 700. I go ahead and take 5 ks. What am I gonna pay you back over what term total? So is it 5,500 over six months or what's the term look like?
Tom Burnside
06:26>> Yeah. Typically, the average price back the days was about 22 to 23 percent
06:33>> weighted average coupon if you think about it in that particular way. And it was typically over three to four years is what we were doing.
Nathan Latka
06:42Well, that's a long payback period. That's a long time to payback.
Tom Burnside
06:45>> Oh, absolutely. Yeah. Even back then, the models were doing a really good job of predicting somebody. Typically, what happens in this this is why we saw the opportunity. In this particular area, you saw a lot of very, very short transactions, six, eight, twelve months. And we saw an opportunity to give somebody something that was very affordable. And so we didn't want to go below twenty four months and we were able to get those out as long
07:05>> as forty eight months, even back in the day by telling, by taking the AI information and doing a better job of telling a story, and therefore giving them something that was affordable. Because one of the problems is if you're paying back $5,000 over twelve months, it's a very expensive payment. When you start to elongate that out, it becomes very affordable and you give them the opportunity to get back on their feet and be able to pay
07:27>> back. And now, most of those customers have come back to renew with us or come back to take another loan with us. We now have about 30% of the base is in a renewal status with us because we made it affordable, they were able to pay it back and they're able to take more money.
Nathan Latka
07:41Mhmm. Just to be clear, if I take that 5 k from you in 2014, I pay it back worth three to four years. My total interest on that 5 k over four years is 1,200.
Tom Burnside
07:50>> Right? That's 23% ish or is it 20% No. Per
07:53>> That's roughly. That's roughly about 23 over that period of time.
Nathan Latka
07:56I see. See. Interesting. Okay.
Tom Burnside
07:59>> Yeah. So it wasn't based on typically what you see in this market is a discount rate, or you see a percentage. That's not what we did. We actually use an interest rate and if we were charging 23%, it's 23% a year based on the outstanding balance, which averages out to about 20, you know, 23 to 30% over the life of the of the of three years.
Nathan Latka
08:20Mhmm. Okay. Got it. So I mean, I mean, can we basically say that that's effectively an 8% APR or interest rate?
Tom Burnside
08:28>> No, you would want to think about it as an interest rate as a 23% interest rate, right? So it's not really a discount. It's just a simple interest rate, like you pay for a car or a house or anything else that you do. If you take some of these discount rates, they could be upwards over 100% interest. And so we think that we're given the best deals in the marketplace hands down.
Nathan Latka
08:48Yeah, and I would agree with that based off comps I know, but talking about the pure interest rate makes you seem really bad be because mean, it makes anyone seem bad because the numbers are scary. But because you give people such a long like, get I totally get this. You give people a long time to pay back. It it it makes it sound a little bit better. But the reason I'm asking these questions is you were
Securing Initial Capital and Cost of Funds
Nathan Latka
09:07able to secure to lend, you have to secure money to lend, right? You secured $100,000,000 basically on day one, I believe. How did you do Well,
Tom Burnside
09:16>> I mean, some of this was based on track record. So we were able to get better pricing on the facilities that we that we borrow from for ourselves to be able to make that money available to our customer. So we were able to get some pretty good rates back in the day. That rates those rates have come down a lot, right, over the last few years.
Nathan Latka
09:32But, Tom, come on.
09:33What was what was what was good back in the day?
Tom Burnside
09:35>> What was good back in the day? We we started off at around a 10% cost of funds on our own.
Nathan Latka
09:40That's not quite a lot of were there warrants involved?
Tom Burnside
09:43>> There wasn't there was a few warrants in there. Like, we I think we gave up 1% in the first year to get a to get some of the good deals.
Nathan Latka
09:49That's that's not bad.
Tom Burnside
09:50>> Not too bad. Not too bad. We didn't feel too bad about it. But the good news, the customer is able to get, you know, because we were able to save money, we were able to push that forward to the customer.
Nathan Latka
09:59No, that's great. I mean, that's exactly why you wanna be able negotiate obviously that low cost capital. Now was your credit box really tight? Right? Did they really restrict you what states you could lend to, scores above six fifty or above, or did you have enough flexibility to actually deploy that capital?
Tom Burnside
10:14>> Yeah, we had enough flexibility. I mean, obviously being in this market for quite a while, what we did is we really used more of our own equity. So our advance rates were a little bit lower, our box was wider, so we could test more. So we were able to go right out the market and test it in the best of ways. We did most of it on own balance sheet to start with, just so we could
10:33>> prove the concept and the model worked.
Nathan Latka
10:35So Tom, to be clear, you raised equity on day one and you were using that capital to test?
Tom Burnside
10:40>> To test the market.
Nathan Latka
10:41How much on day one? Do you remember?
Tom Burnside
10:43>> Well, yeah. So the the what's interesting, the group of team the team we have here raised about $220,000,000 of friends and family. Just really no outside rounds, but friends and family, we raised that over, you know, over about probably four or five different tranches that we re raised it, but we didn't really consider them A rounds, B rounds. They were friends and family coming to the table. We had other deals that we had done together that
11:06>> worked out well, and so it was relatively easy to raise that. Our first institutional raise didn't actually happen until 2020.
Nathan Latka
11:13Well, that's why I'm asking. So that 02/20, like that capital you started on your balance sheet on day one, was that like a prom note on the operating company or was it actual equity that your friends and family, they put money in for equity in the business?
Tom Burnside
11:24>> A little combination of both. Some of it just pure equity, some of it was more mezzanine type structure. So a little combination of both, but it allowed us to use that money to leverage to be able to get us access to capital, be able to test our models and make sure that our models were as predictive as we were hoping they were going to be. They became that over a short period of time and therefore then
11:51>> the cost of capital continues to go down as your performance of models are better. It's magic that way, right?
Nathan Latka
11:57There's a lot of fintech entrepreneurs listening to this interview, and they're all wondering how much loan tape and vintage history do they have to build to drive their costs from 121% warrants down to 8% to bring in a bank on top of the credit fund or whatever to drive the blended down. What did you back then have to grow your loan tape to get significant savings below that 10% cost of capital on your first 100,000,000?
Tom Burnside
12:18>> That's a great question. I think there's a couple of things. The weighted average life of an asset, even though you write it for twenty four or thirty six months, people end up paying it off in eighteen months or they paid off in sixteen months. So within about a year, a year and a half, you have a pretty good idea of how the curves are going to work because most of your losses are really front ended in
12:41>> the first six months, you'll see about 60% of your losses on a vintage analysis curve. So it's relatively easy. Once you get past six months, they can kind of predict the rest of your curve. So a year into it, you've got a couple of turns of products. But it really wasn't until we got over, call it $100,000,000 of transactions until they said, look, you got enough scale, enough predictability, and a couple turns of the product that
13:06>> we feel comfortable in giving you better pricing and better advance rates.
Nathan Latka
13:10Okay, this makes sense. And let me A couple of things I wanna pull out here because it's great for consumers listening. First off, you don't charge prepayment penalties, which is great, right? You let people pay off early if they want.
Tom Burnside
13:19>> That's right.
Year One: $15M in Loans and Early Learnings
Nathan Latka
13:20Yep. A very flexible capital product. That's fantastic. No hidden fees. Talk to me about scale that first year. So just total amount of loans done in 2014, do you remember?
Tom Burnside
13:29>> Yeah, it was about $15,000,000 It wasn't a lot. It wasn't a lot.
Nathan Latka
13:34But it felt like a lot back then, though.
Tom Burnside
13:36>> It sure did. And we learned a lot.
Nathan Latka
13:39I was gonna say, I mean, we can sort of calculate. Right? If you had 15 out, you gave us 23% minus 10%. That's a 100 what is that? You know, 13 points of spread. Right? That's nice. It's a good business. So you go, okay. We're onto something. What's next?
Tom Burnside
13:51>> Well, then you have these little things called losses, right? So you have the cost of capital, but you also have losses, your second largest component. So it a lean year, but it was a great year of learning, a great year of understanding how their credit models were going to perform and what we needed to augment them to get the losses in line with where we were hoping them to be.
Growth to 2018: $360M Originated and Capital Expansion
Nathan Latka
14:13I love this. Okay, so that's a great This guy, this is year one, just heard it. Year one, now let's go fast forward, Tom. 2018, How much total capital raised over the prior four, sorry, lent over the prior four years?
Tom Burnside
14:25>> So I mean, got, what's interesting about it is we hit about $360,000,000 or so. So things were starting to grow.
Nathan Latka
14:33$360,000,000 in loans in 2018?
Tom Burnside
14:35>> Yeah, the capacity is starting to grow now, we're starting to get in a great place. The models are performing well, we have a couple of different lines of credit now at this point, all of them have been upsized. So now we have access to roughly, think I at that particular point about $350 to $400,000,000 of capacity at that particular point in time. Life is getting better, cost of funds are coming down by a couple of points.
14:58>> So those spreads are widening, which is always good, it helps pay bills.
Crossing $500M in Originations and Pricing Inflection
Nathan Latka
15:03Mhmm. So I mean, we're talking like you get down to 7% in 2018, 6%, something like that?
Tom Burnside
15:07>> It was about 8%. It was about 8% at that point. Right? And it wasn't until you really cross over a $500,000,000 of originations a year until pricing really starts to come of real scale.
Nathan Latka
15:17When did you hit that?
Tom Burnside
15:19>> We hit that in 2019.
Nathan Latka
15:21Okay.
Tom Burnside
15:21>> And that's happening Yes. In New York
Nathan Latka
15:25Wow. Okay. That's fantastic. I mean, of the problems a lot of folks have when they do these deals is they think they wanna go raise a big warehouse facility. The problem is you end up with unused fees if you can't attract customers and deploy it quickly. It sounds like you just told me in 2018, you had 400,000,000 in capacity, but you did $360,000,000. That's very good optimization in terms of actually utilizing what you took down on
15:46the facility size. How did you plan that so well?
Tom Burnside
15:49>> Well, the nice thing about growth is our models have really led, our AI models from a marketing perspective have really led who we go after and how big that TAM is or that total addressable market. So we knew basically based on our efforts what we needed to do to grow the next $10,000,000 next $20,000,000 a month. And so what you're really trying now to do is line up capital, the capital that you need to backstop that
16:17>> advance rate and grow and continue to grow the business. And so that was all kind of coming together at that particular point and really limiting factor was capital. It's just how much capital do you have on the books. That was really more of your limiting factor, more so than the capacity of the lines.
2021 Capital Deployed of $2.1B and Q1 2022
Nathan Latka
16:34Yeah, very cool. And then fast forward to date, obviously, we're the middle of twenty twenty two, but what was 2021 total loans, new loans done that year?
Tom Burnside
16:40>> 2021, I mean, very was interesting year. We grew 144% year over year, '20 to '21.
Nathan Latka
16:47What number?
Tom Burnside
16:48>> Capital deployed?
Nathan Latka
16:49Yeah,
Tom Burnside
16:50>> I'm sorry.
Nathan Latka
16:52What number grew by that amount?
Tom Burnside
16:54>> The capital deployed The or the
16:56>> funding levels. The We'll talk about revenue here in just a second, the funding levels themselves. So we went from roughly about, we went to $2,100,000,000 in 2021, which is a huge growth. We slowed down a little bit during COVID in 2020, but then we had just significant, of closed a little under 1,000,000,000, then went to 2,100,000,000. So we had significant growth kind of year over year. You know, this year, we're already starting out about 800 and
17:28>> about almost $900,000,000 just
Nathan Latka
17:30for You've already done 900,000,000 in q one?
Tom Burnside
17:32>> Yes.
Nathan Latka
17:33Incredible. Yeah.
Tom Burnside
17:34>> It's it's it's growing quickly now.
2021 Net Revenue of $330M
Nathan Latka
17:36That's incredible. Okay. I didn't bring it up, but you did. Talk to me about revenue.
Tom Burnside
17:41>> So from a revenue perspective, I think there's probably two pieces here. In 2021, we were at about $330,000,000.
Nathan Latka
17:48Mhmm. That's a run rate. Net interest margin, or is that before you pay out your cost of capital?
Tom Burnside
17:55>> This is basically this is our this is our net revenue. Right?
Nathan Latka
17:58After you pay back your warehouse providers all that?
Tom Burnside
18:01>> That's right.
Nathan Latka
18:01Wow. 350, you said?
Tom Burnside
18:03>> $333,300,000. So approximately $330,000,000 and will be around 600,000,000 this year.
Nathan Latka
18:08That's incredible. And what's
18:10your first million dollar year? Do you remember? Was that 2015?
Tom Burnside
18:14>> Yeah. It was 2015.
Nathan Latka
18:15Yeah. You got there pretty quick because I'm doing the spread on 15,000,000 out, right? With 13 points of spread, you get there quick. Yep. Interesting. Most most businesses like this have trouble scaling for for two reasons. They have to fight yield compression. Right? Because more money will plow into the market. Right? If it's a known known asset class. Right? The second is your Google ad expense goes up, right? You have to have CAC arbitrage somehow. So
18:38how have you fought both of these headwinds on both sides keep scaling so fast?
Tom Burnside
18:43>> Well, look, I think the question has always been in the FinTech space. Is it scalable? Is it predictive? And is it sustainable? Can you grow it? Can you continue to grow it at appropriate rates? And I think we've answered those questions. I think, first of all, the biggest challenge you have is you have to be able to optimize your cost to acquire a customer. And that really comes through your ability to renew a customer. I mean,
19:09>> have an 86 net promoter score. We work really hard on our customer to make sure that our customer is having a great experience because if they have a great experience, they come back. They see you as kind of that trusted advisor. So I mean, right now, about 25 to 30% of our base runs in renewals, just renewals alone. These are customers just coming And
300,000 Customers and $11,000 Average Loan Size
Nathan Latka
19:28how many by the way? So how right now, if you look at your loan type, how many customers have at least a dollar out with you?
Tom Burnside
19:33>> We're a little over 300, right at 300. 300,000? And we've serviced about four fifty in total.
Nathan Latka
19:41Wow, so that's a very high renewal rate actually, right? I'd expect that number to be way higher if people weren't coming back, but it's actually not a big number of people.
Tom Burnside
19:48>> That's right. And the average transaction today is about 11,000, right? So it's moved from the five thousand days to about 11,000 today.
Point-of-Sale Acquisition and Product Diversification
Nathan Latka
19:57And you still like it's still sort of three to the average deal, three to four year payback, 23% ish?
Tom Burnside
20:03>> Well, we bought a point of sale company and so things moved, changed a little bit when we bought the point of sale. When we bought the point of sale company, we were able to move to seven and ten year paper for home improvement. So we're in the home improvement space and point of sale as well as medical. And in those spaces, you tend to go a little longer in turn. On a direct to consumer type of
20:22>> product, it's typically still around five years to the typical duration.
Nathan Latka
20:29So, is really interesting. I talked to lot of SaaS founders that have built like a really interesting marketplace that maybe connects, I'm gonna make this up, a lumber provider of two by fours with construction workers. And there's a massive audience on both sides and they sit in the middle. And what they're doing now is sort of factoring the paper, right, on thirty day things. Correct me if I'm wrong, you effectively understand how exciting this is. You
20:51might go buy that thing and you already know the finance side of the business. So, you'll sit in middle and just start doing that in the construction space.
Tom Burnside
20:58>> That's right. Interesting. Yeah, mean, for an example, if you some look at our e commerce space, I mean, setting there to help the small business or the e commerce business, we're helping them buy inventory, so they can they can deploy. So, yeah, they run a sale, they run low on inventory, they use us as a backstop to be able to fill back up the inventory. I just said on consumer side as well as small business.
Nathan Latka
21:22I'm just impressed you've been able to do this because there are competitors that only do one of these things that you're dealing with. So like billd.com does this in vendor management construction. Obviously, Paylocity and Clearco in the e commerce space. Like all the areas you just mentioned, there are billion dollar competitors. So how are you winning? How are you going into these markets and sort of building a better mousetrap?
Tom Burnside
21:45>> Look, we have an amazing team. We really do. Mean, the team has been around this space for a very long time. We also have great connections into the financial markets. So we've been able to get the lines of credit, the things we need to do in order to be able to provide the service. Our platform today services banks and credit unions and ABSs forward flows, as well as our own balance sheet. You know, we have a
22:09>> lot of optionality for our customer and we continue to grow the optionality to be able to make sure that we can aggressively price, that we can give them the right product at the right time with the right amount of money, you know, to fulfill whatever it is that they're trying to do at that point.
Current Debt Capacity and Competitive Positioning
Nathan Latka
22:23I have a bunch of other questions on how you securitize and all that, but unfortunately, we're running low on time. So I'll just simplify the question. How much debt capacity do you have right now? You're doing 900,000,000 a quarter, how much could you lend?
Tom Burnside
22:35>> We can easily get to a billion to billion 5 with what we have right now. It's a combination of warehouses, ABSs, forward flows, bank commitments, things of that sort that make that happen. But we know we can get to at least a billion 5. And the question really is in this market, we're seeing some pullback from some of our competitors. And I think it's an opportunity, we have the right kind of product and the performance and
22:58>> portfolio, I think we're going to continue to take advantage of the marketplace where it's at.
Valuation Discussion and Profitability
Nathan Latka
23:02And what you know better than anybody, what are these kinds of companies getting valued at today? Is it a multiple, like let's look at 2021, is it a multiple on your three thirty or do you get a multiple, lower multiple on loans done 2,100,000,000?
Tom Burnside
23:15>> It's a challenge. This is the challenge for valuation, right? The challenge of valuation is a very fast growing company, earnings lag. So typically, these are discounted cash flow models, I'm really looking more at a multiple of revenue Typically, a lot of times it's either forward or post, but a lot of times they're looking forward now because on a really fast growing revenue company, they'd probably look more like in our case, the $600,000,000 than they would look
23:43>> at the $330,000,000. You know what I'm saying? So, but that is a valuation challenge because a fast growing company will continue to have massive scale and efficiencies of scale and growth in revenue that won't show up in earnings in the first year. So you really kind of need to do it more as a discounted cash flow we see primarily over a five year period or even a ten year period to pick up the value of what
24:05>> you're creating.
Nathan Latka
24:06So if you do this analysis last year, what did you guide the business out if you're on a DCF model on it? I mean, it's gotta be in the billion, I mean, definitely in the billions, right? You pass 5,000,000,000?
Tom Burnside
24:15>> So we're, I'm gonna hold that at this particular point.
Nathan Latka
24:19Guys, I got so much. The flow was so good. We're smiling, we're laughing, and then I hit him with valuation and he shuts down.
Tom Burnside
24:26>> Yeah. Here's the deal. We're making money. We'll make 100 plus this year.
Nathan Latka
24:31100,000,000 net?
Tom Burnside
24:33>> Yeah. 100, 120. And we're one of the only ones that are growing at the rate we're growing and making that level of profit. So we're going to let the markets decide that at some point, but we felt like we're in a really great spot. Feel like the things are moving in the right direction, the predictability of the models continue to get better, the AI's growing fast on both the credit, but also on the pricing of the
24:59>> products. And it's really accelerated our growth and we're pretty excited about where we're at.
Warburg Pincus Partnership and Zero Secondary
Nathan Latka
25:05Let me just put this, the one hundred twenty five Warburg put in, more or less than 5% of the business.
Tom Burnside
25:15>> Warburg's an amazing partner.
Nathan Latka
25:18This guy's a great politician over here.
Tom Burnside
25:23>> Look, Warburg was the first institutional round that we've taken. And they've been amazing partners. Like they have been really, really good. I think we do well as a company, so that helps the relationship.
Nathan Latka
25:35They were debt first, imagine, right? Were they one of your debt partners early on?
Tom Burnside
25:38>> No.
Nathan Latka
25:39Oh, they weren't? Oh, wow.
Tom Burnside
25:40>> No, no.
Nathan Latka
25:40They didn't
Tom Burnside
25:41>> come in until 2000 they came in during COVID. So even during COVID, the models had really, really helped. The beta risk was still low. And they followed us for about six months and then jumped in. And so, yeah, great great partners. You know, they put in a $175,000,000 now themselves into the company. So, you know
Nathan Latka
26:02How much was secondary?
Tom Burnside
26:05>> None. No.
Nathan Latka
26:06Oh, I thought you're gonna say all of I thought all of it would be secondary with you printing out a 100,000,000 in free cash flow, why wouldn't it all be secondary?
Tom Burnside
26:13>> Well, remember, we continue to pour that money back into the business right now to continue to grow it. At the pace we're growing, you need to feed the proverbial beast, right? So that money keeps going back into the organization and we have taken no secondary. We have poured all the money back into the company to keep the coffee growing.
Retaining Early Employees and Future Liquidity
Nathan Latka
26:30Well, Tom, okay, last question as we wrap up. How do you keep early employees excited about an eventual payday? You're not public, there's no secondary options. They've been with you since 2014. You maybe use options to recruit them. When are they going to see money?
Tom Burnside
26:44>> We're gonna let the market When the market's ready, we'll be ready.
26:48>> Look, We have an amazing team of people. A lot of these people I work with me at least two to three other companies.
26:56>> And they believe in kind of the overall dream and where we're going. Our success is squarely on their shoulders.
Nathan Latka
27:04When did you hire your last CFO, your current one that's with you? When did you hire him or her?
Tom Burnside
27:08>> 2019.
Famous Five Rapid Fire Questions
Nathan Latka
27:09Interesting. Alright, guys. I expect an s one filing in q three this year. You heard it here first. Tom, let's wrap up with let's wrap up with I'm gonna get him in trouble. Yeah. Tom, let's wrap up here with the famous five. These are easy. Number one, favorite business book.
Tom Burnside
27:26>> You know, my mind is mine is I'm a Jim Collins fan. Right? And so anything really Jim Collins writes, I'm a big fan of. Good to Great is probably my favorite.
Nathan Latka
27:38Number two, is there a CEO you're following or studying?
Tom Burnside
27:43>> Yeah. I mean, I think Jamie Dimon has got to be the guy. Right? He's he's been very, very much on top of his game.
Nathan Latka
27:49Number three, what's your favorite online tool for building lendingpoint?
Tom Burnside
27:55>> Oh, boy. Then I I I don't know that I can answer that question. I'm gonna offend somebody.
Nathan Latka
27:59Alright. We'll skip that one. We'll skip that one. Stay stay neutral. Number four, how many hours of sleep do get every night?
Tom Burnside
28:04>> About six.
Nathan Latka
28:06And situation, married, single kids?
Tom Burnside
28:09>> Married and married and two daughters.
Nathan Latka
28:11Two kiddos. And how old are you, Jim? Or Tom, sorry.
Tom Burnside
28:16>> Young. I'm 58.
28:18>> 58.
Nathan Latka
28:19Last question. Take us back to your 20 year old self. What's something you wish you knew?
Tom Burnside
28:24>> It it was all gonna work out. Keep going.
Nathan Latka
28:27Guys, there you have. There's a lot of flash in the pan. Startups raising a billion dollar valuations right now that have lent a total of, like, you know, 15,000,000 or something. It's crazy. Then you look at this story. It's unbelievable. Back in 2014, I said, you know what? We have an opportunity here to do good and do well at the same time. 15,000,000 loans done, average loan side of $5,000 to consumers with a six twenty credit
28:46score or above. They made money that first year by raising capital at about 10%, lending at about 23%. Make a spread. Fast forward to 2018, 400,000,000 capacity, three sixty lent out, same economics, a little lower cost capital. Now today, incredible growth. Have about 11,000 in their average loan size, 600,000,000 is the revenue they'll do this year with about 120 profit. 30% of new customers are repeat, 300,000 customers to date as they continue to scale with very
29:11little outside capital. Thanks for so much, Tom, for taking us to the top.
Tom Burnside
29:15>> Appreciate the time.
Nathan Latka
29:18One more thing before you go. We have a brand new show every Thursday at one p. M. Central. It's called Shark Tank for SaaS. We call it deal or bust. One founder comes on, three hungry buyers, they try and do a deal live and the founder shares back end dashboards, their expenses, their revenue, ARPU, CAC, LTV, you name it, they share it and the buyers try and make a deal live. It is fun to watch every
29:42Thursday one p. M. Central. Additionally, remember these recorded founder interviews go live. We release them here on YouTube every day at two p. M. Central. To make sure you don't miss any of that, make sure you click the subscribe button below here on YouTube, the big red button and then click the little bell notification to make sure you get notifications when we do go live. I wouldn't want you to miss breaking news in the SaaS world,
30:04whether it's an acquisition, a big fundraise, a big sale, a big profitability statement or something else. I don't want you to miss it. Additionally, if you want to take this conversation deeper and further, we have by far the largest private Slack community for B2B SaaS founders. You want to get in there. We've probably talked about your tool if you're running a company or your firm if you're investing. You can go in there and quickly search and
30:25see what people are saying. Sign up for that at nathanlatka.com slack. In the meantime, I'm hanging out with you here on YouTube. I'll be in the comments for the next thirty minutes. Feel free to let me know what you thought about this episode and if you enjoyed it, click the thumbs up. We get a lot of haters that are mad at how aggressive I am on these shows, but I do it so that we can all
30:44learn. We have to counter those people. We got to push them away. Click the thumbs up below to counter them and know that I appreciate your guys'support. Alright, I'll be in the comments. See you.