Lingohub vs Localizely: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Lingohub generates $823.9K in revenue; Localizely generates $330K. Lingohub is 2.5× bigger than Localizely by revenue. The table below compares Lingohub and Localizely on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  LingohubThis company |  Localizely |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $823.9K | $330K |
| Valuation | $4.9M | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 7 | 3 |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| HQ | Austria | United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Lingohub at a glance
Lingohub generates $823.9K in revenue with 7 employees, headquartered in Austria.
- Revenue
- $823.9K
- Valuation
- $4.9M
- Team size
- 7
- Founded
- 2012
Developer of a localization management platform. The company's platform offers continuous translation of software, mobile or web applications to integrate localization into the software development process.
Localizely at a glance
Localizely generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2018
Localizely is a translation management system for agile teams that streamlines software localization. We believe translation management for apps should be easy, so the team can focus on things that bring business value. Developers can…
Other Lingohub alternatives
Lingohub competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Lingohub vs Localizely: frequently asked questions
Is Lingohub or Localizely bigger?
Lingohub is the bigger company by revenue, at $823.9K against $330K for Localizely.
How much revenue does Lingohub make?
Lingohub generates $823.9K in annual revenue with a team of 7.
How much revenue does Localizely make?
Localizely generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.