Latka logo

Macro vs SodaPDF: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Macro generates $3M in revenue; SodaPDF generates $7.8M. SodaPDF is 2.6× bigger than Macro by revenue. The table below compares Macro and SodaPDF on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Macro vs SodaPDF compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyMacro logoMacroThis companySodaPDF logoSodaPDF
Revenue$3M$7.8M
Team sizeNot disclosed87
FoundedNot disclosed2010
HQUnited StatesMontreal, Canada

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Macro logo

Macro at a glance

Macro generates $3M in revenue, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$3M

Macro PDF is a fully-featured PDF app that makes your documents interactive and editable. Click any cross-reference (e.g. Fig. 2, Ch. 3) for a preview window and navigate with multiple tabs like a browser. It's great for academic papers…

SodaPDF logo

SodaPDF at a glance

SodaPDF generates $7.8M in revenue with 87 employees, headquartered in Montreal, Canada.

Revenue
$7.8M
Team size
87
Founded
2010

Meet the very first fully functional desktop AND online PDF solution. With Soda PDF Anywhere, users can access features on any device with a web browser, including laptops, smartphones, and tablets

Other Macro alternatives

Macro competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Macro vs SodaPDF: frequently asked questions

Is Macro or SodaPDF bigger?

SodaPDF is the bigger company by revenue, at $7.8M against $3M for Macro.

How much revenue does Macro make?

Macro generates $3M in annual revenue.

How much revenue does SodaPDF make?

SodaPDF generates $7.8M in annual revenue with a team of 87.