Magic Minutes vs Meetingbird: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Magic Minutes generates $94.4K in revenue; Meetingbird generates $78.4K. Magic Minutes is 1.2× bigger than Meetingbird by revenue. The table below compares Magic Minutes and Meetingbird on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $94.4K | $78.4K |
| Valuation | $660.9K | Not disclosed |
| Customers | Not disclosed | 15K |
| Team size | 2 | 1 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| HQ | Shrewsbury, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Magic Minutes at a glance
Magic Minutes generates $94.4K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Shrewsbury, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $94.4K
- Valuation
- $660.9K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2016
Magic Minutes is an online note-taking and meeting software.
Meetingbird at a glance
Meetingbird generates $78.4K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
- Revenue
- $78.4K
- Customers
- 15K
- Team size
- 1
- Founded
- 2016
Developer of a meeting scheduling software designed to help teams and meetings be more transparent and productive. The company's software offers a smart calendar that makes scheduling team meetings fast and easy by analyzing the…
Other Magic Minutes alternatives
Magic Minutes competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Magic Minutes vs Meetingbird: frequently asked questions
Is Magic Minutes or Meetingbird bigger?
Magic Minutes is the bigger company by revenue, at $94.4K against $78.4K for Meetingbird.
How much revenue does Magic Minutes make?
Magic Minutes generates $94.4K in annual revenue with a team of 2.
How much revenue does Meetingbird make?
Meetingbird generates $78.4K in annual revenue with a team of 1.