Latka logo

Mclowd vs Zima: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Mclowd generates $320.1K in revenue; Zima generates $312.7K. Mclowd and Zima are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Mclowd and Zima on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Mclowd vs Zima compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyMclowd logoMclowdThis companyZima logoZima
Revenue$320.1K$312.7K
Team size63
Founded20122013
HQPaddington, AustraliaBeirut, Lebanon

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Mclowd logo

Mclowd at a glance

Mclowd generates $320.1K in revenue with 6 employees, headquartered in Paddington, Australia.

Revenue
$320.1K
Team size
6
Founded
2012

Provider of a self-managed super fund platform. The company offers a a cloud-based platform which allows users to manage and report their self-managed super fund. The company also offers a marketplace to connect with professionals for…

Zima logo

Zima at a glance

Zima generates $312.7K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Beirut, Lebanon.

Revenue
$312.7K
Team size
3
Founded
2013

Developer of a cloud-based SaaS platform intended to help Internet Service Providers manage their user bandwidth, billing and subscriptions. The company's platform helps users in the areas of operations setup, quota consumption and peak…

Other Mclowd alternatives

Mclowd competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Mclowd vs Zima: frequently asked questions

Is Mclowd or Zima bigger?

Mclowd is the bigger company by revenue, at $320.1K against $312.7K for Zima.

How much revenue does Mclowd make?

Mclowd generates $320.1K in annual revenue with a team of 6.

How much revenue does Zima make?

Zima generates $312.7K in annual revenue with a team of 3.