MerlinCryption vs Metacert: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
MerlinCryption generates $440K in revenue; Metacert generates $362.1K. MerlinCryption is 1.2× bigger than Metacert by revenue. The table below compares MerlinCryption and Metacert on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  MerlinCryptionThis company |  Metacert |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $440K | $362.1K |
| Funding raised | Not disclosed | $2.2M |
| Customers | Not disclosed | 350 |
| Team size | 4 | 1 |
| Founded | 2011 | 2013 |
| HQ | Austin, United States | San Francisco, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
MerlinCryption at a glance
MerlinCryption generates $440K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.
- Revenue
- $440K
- Team size
- 4
- Founded
- 2011
Encryption platform
Metacert at a glance
Metacert generates $362.1K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
- Revenue
- $362.1K
- Funding
- $2.2M
- Customers
- 350
- Team size
- 1
- Founded
- 2013
Data loss detection and prevention for companies that use Team Collaboration services. Protection against malicious and unwanted URLs.
Other MerlinCryption alternatives
MerlinCryption competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
MerlinCryption vs Metacert: frequently asked questions
Is MerlinCryption or Metacert bigger?
MerlinCryption is the bigger company by revenue, at $440K against $362.1K for Metacert.
How much revenue does MerlinCryption make?
MerlinCryption generates $440K in annual revenue with a team of 4.
How much revenue does Metacert make?
Metacert generates $362.1K in annual revenue with a team of 1.
How much funding has Metacert raised?
Metacert has raised $2.2M in total funding since it was founded in 2013.