Latka logo

MetaPipe vs OpenOnDemand: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

MetaPipe generates $527.1K in revenue; OpenOnDemand generates $537.5K. OpenOnDemand and MetaPipe are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares MetaPipe and OpenOnDemand on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

MetaPipe vs OpenOnDemand compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyMetaPipe logoMetaPipeThis companyOpenOnDemand logoOpenOnDemand
Revenue$527.1K$537.5K
Valuation$3.2MNot disclosed
Team size38
Founded20162009
HQProvo, United StatesSydney, Australia

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

MetaPipe logo

MetaPipe at a glance

MetaPipe generates $527.1K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Provo, United States.

Revenue
$527.1K
Valuation
$3.2M
Team size
3
Founded
2016

Developer of a cloud based animation platform designed to deploy fully virtualized VFX and animation studios infrastructure. The company's cloud based animation platform provides an easy-to-use dashboard that deploys an entire high-end…

OpenOnDemand logo

OpenOnDemand at a glance

OpenOnDemand generates $537.5K in revenue with 8 employees, headquartered in Sydney, Australia.

Revenue
$537.5K
Team size
8
Founded
2009

Hosted CRM Platform for SME

Other MetaPipe alternatives

MetaPipe competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

MetaPipe vs OpenOnDemand: frequently asked questions

Is MetaPipe or OpenOnDemand bigger?

OpenOnDemand is the bigger company by revenue, at $537.5K against $527.1K for MetaPipe.

How much revenue does MetaPipe make?

MetaPipe generates $527.1K in annual revenue with a team of 3.

How much revenue does OpenOnDemand make?

OpenOnDemand generates $537.5K in annual revenue with a team of 8.