Mura vs Silkcloud: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Mura generates $1.2M in revenue; Silkcloud generates $1.2M. Mura and Silkcloud are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Mura and Silkcloud on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  MuraThis company |  Silkcloud |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Funding raised | $4.5M | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 11 | 21 |
| Founded | 2001 | 2014 |
| HQ | New York, United States | Not disclosed |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Mura at a glance
Mura generates $1.2M in revenue with 11 employees, headquartered in New York, United States.
- Revenue
- $1.2M
- Funding
- $4.5M
- Team size
- 11
- Founded
- 2001
Automate billing and dispatch - without more software.
Silkcloud at a glance
Silkcloud generates $1.2M in revenue with 21 employees.
- Revenue
- $1.2M
- Team size
- 21
- Founded
- 2014
Provider of a cloud based E-Commerce platform. The company's platform enables users to unify identity, authorize multi channel catalog, multi channel order management, billing and payment services of Enterprises.
Other Mura alternatives
Mura competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Mura vs Silkcloud: frequently asked questions
Is Mura or Silkcloud bigger?
Mura is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.2M against $1.2M for Silkcloud.
How much revenue does Mura make?
Mura generates $1.2M in annual revenue with a team of 11.
How much revenue does Silkcloud make?
Silkcloud generates $1.2M in annual revenue with a team of 21.
How much funding has Mura raised?
Mura has raised $4.5M in total funding since it was founded in 2001.