Nama vs Zingtree: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Nama generates $4.2M in revenue; Zingtree generates $4.1M. Nama and Zingtree are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Nama and Zingtree on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.2M | $4.1M |
| Team size | 38 | 37 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| HQ | United States | Palo Alto, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Nama at a glance
Nama generates $4.2M in revenue with 38 employees, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $4.2M
- Team size
- 38
- Founded
- 2014
Nama combines human and artificial intelligence to help companies provide great customer experience at scale.
Zingtree at a glance
Zingtree generates $4.1M in revenue with 37 employees, headquartered in Palo Alto, United States.
- Revenue
- $4.1M
- Team size
- 37
- Founded
- 2020
Zingtree is the first AI Agent Builder for complex support, enabling enterprises to deliver accurate resolutions with controlled and compliant AI decisions powered by real-time data from backend systems. Trusted by Sony, Optum, and…
Other Nama alternatives
Nama competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Nama vs Zingtree: frequently asked questions
Is Nama or Zingtree bigger?
Nama is the bigger company by revenue, at $4.2M against $4.1M for Zingtree.
How much revenue does Nama make?
Nama generates $4.2M in annual revenue with a team of 38.
How much revenue does Zingtree make?
Zingtree generates $4.1M in annual revenue with a team of 37.