Latka logo

Consult Umbrella vs Ninite: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Consult Umbrella generates $31.6K in revenue; Ninite generates $196K. Ninite is 6.2× bigger than Consult Umbrella by revenue. The table below compares Consult Umbrella and Ninite on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Consult Umbrella vs Ninite compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyConsult Umbrella logoConsult UmbrellaThis companyNinite logoNinite
Revenue$31.6K$196K
Valuation$221.1KNot disclosed
CustomersNot disclosed1K
Team size12
Founded20152008
HQLong Island City, United StatesUnited States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Consult Umbrella logo

Consult Umbrella at a glance

Consult Umbrella generates $31.6K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Long Island City, United States.

Revenue
$31.6K
Valuation
$221.1K
Team size
1
Founded
2015

Consult Umbrella is a manufacturing company that specializes in business IT solutions. They provide simple and efficient IT services to businesses

Ninite logo

Ninite at a glance

Ninite generates $196K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$196K
Customers
1K
Team size
2
Founded
2008

Simple third-party app patching and deployment for Windows.

Other Consult Umbrella alternatives

Consult Umbrella competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Consult Umbrella vs Ninite: frequently asked questions

Is Consult Umbrella or Ninite bigger?

Ninite is the bigger company by revenue, at $196K against $31.6K for Consult Umbrella.

How much revenue does Consult Umbrella make?

Consult Umbrella generates $31.6K in annual revenue with a team of 1.

How much revenue does Ninite make?

Ninite generates $196K in annual revenue with a team of 2.