EquipmentShare vs Noko Time Tracking: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; Noko Time Tracking has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares EquipmentShare and Noko Time Tracking on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  EquipmentShareThis company |  Noko Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 3K | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2014 | 2008 |
| HQ | Columbia, United States | United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
EquipmentShare at a glance
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.3B
- Team size
- 3K
- Founded
- 2014
Cloud solutions for the construction industry.
Noko Time Tracking at a glance
- Founded
- 2008
Time tracking your employees will actually enjoy using.
Other EquipmentShare alternatives
EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
EquipmentShare vs Noko Time Tracking: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.