Latka logo

EquipmentShare vs onOffice: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; onOffice has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares EquipmentShare and onOffice on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

EquipmentShare vs onOffice compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyEquipmentShare logoEquipmentShareThis companyonOffice logoonOffice
Revenue$2.3BNot disclosed
Team size3KNot disclosed
Founded20142001
HQColumbia, United StatesAachen, Germany

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

EquipmentShare logo

EquipmentShare at a glance

EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.

Revenue
$2.3B
Team size
3K
Founded
2014

Cloud solutions for the construction industry.

onOffice logo

onOffice at a glance

Founded
2001

Integrated office solutions.

Other EquipmentShare alternatives

EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

EquipmentShare vs onOffice: frequently asked questions

How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?

EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.