Orange Button vs SavvyPlus: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Orange Button generates $220K in revenue; SavvyPlus generates $297.2K. SavvyPlus is 1.4× bigger than Orange Button by revenue. The table below compares Orange Button and SavvyPlus on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Orange ButtonThis company |  SavvyPlus |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $220K | $297.2K |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $2.1M |
| Team size | 2 | 3 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| HQ | Berkeley, United States | Docklands, Australia |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Orange Button at a glance
Orange Button generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Berkeley, United States.
- Revenue
- $220K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2016
Orange Button is a data exchange standard and open source community for the solar+energy storage industry.
SavvyPlus at a glance
SavvyPlus generates $297.2K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Docklands, Australia.
- Revenue
- $297.2K
- Valuation
- $2.1M
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2014
Developer of an energy business intelligence platform designed to help manage energy usage. The company's platform offers technical computing, data analysis, quantitative finance management, software development and data modelling…
Other Orange Button alternatives
Orange Button competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Orange Button vs SavvyPlus: frequently asked questions
Is Orange Button or SavvyPlus bigger?
SavvyPlus is the bigger company by revenue, at $297.2K against $220K for Orange Button.
How much revenue does Orange Button make?
Orange Button generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.
How much revenue does SavvyPlus make?
SavvyPlus generates $297.2K in annual revenue with a team of 3.