Latka logo

Orchid vs Recurrent.ai: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Orchid generates $13.6M in revenue; Recurrent.ai generates $13.5M. Orchid and Recurrent.ai are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Orchid and Recurrent.ai on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Orchid vs Recurrent.ai compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyOrchid logoOrchidThis companyRecurrent.ai logoRecurrent.ai
Revenue$13.6M$13.5M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$60M
Team size925
FoundedNot disclosed2017
HQSan Francisco, United StatesBeijing, China

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Orchid logo

Orchid at a glance

Orchid generates $13.6M in revenue with 9 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$13.6M
Team size
9

AI-powered EHR for independent mental health professionals

Recurrent.ai logo

Recurrent.ai at a glance

Recurrent.ai generates $13.5M in revenue with 25 employees, headquartered in Beijing, China.

Revenue
$13.5M
Funding
$60M
Team size
25
Founded
2017

Recurrent.ai is a Chinese company that provides AI-enabled corporate services to improve sales efficiency.

Other Orchid alternatives

Orchid competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Orchid vs Recurrent.ai: frequently asked questions

Is Orchid or Recurrent.ai bigger?

Orchid is the bigger company by revenue, at $13.6M against $13.5M for Recurrent.ai.

How much revenue does Orchid make?

Orchid generates $13.6M in annual revenue with a team of 9.

How much revenue does Recurrent.ai make?

Recurrent.ai generates $13.5M in annual revenue with a team of 25.

How much funding has Recurrent.ai raised?

Recurrent.ai has raised $60M in total funding since it was founded in 2017.