Latka logo

Ozone vs QuickBlox: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Ozone generates $3.2M in revenue; QuickBlox generates $3.2M. QuickBlox and Ozone are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Ozone and QuickBlox on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Ozone vs QuickBlox compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyOzone logoOzoneThis companyQuickBlox logoQuickBlox
Revenue$3.2M$3.2M
ValuationNot disclosed$32.2M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$1.2M
Team size2138
Founded20212009
HQSan Francisco, United StatesLondon, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Ozone logo

Ozone at a glance

Ozone generates $3.2M in revenue with 21 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$3.2M
Team size
21
Founded
2021

Figma for video

QuickBlox logo

QuickBlox at a glance

QuickBlox generates $3.2M in revenue with 38 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$3.2M
Valuation
$32.2M
Funding
$1.2M
Team size
38
Founded
2009

Provider of a cloud communication backend platform. The company allows users to add chat, video calling, push notifications, cloud sync into mobile and web applications.

Other Ozone alternatives

Ozone competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Ozone vs QuickBlox: frequently asked questions

Is Ozone or QuickBlox bigger?

QuickBlox is the bigger company by revenue, at $3.2M against $3.2M for Ozone.

How much revenue does Ozone make?

Ozone generates $3.2M in annual revenue with a team of 21.

How much revenue does QuickBlox make?

QuickBlox generates $3.2M in annual revenue with a team of 38.

How much funding has QuickBlox raised?

QuickBlox has raised $1.2M in total funding since it was founded in 2009.