RAM Technologies vs PatientFi: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
RAM Technologies generates $15.3M in revenue; PatientFi generates $15M. RAM Technologies and PatientFi are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares RAM Technologies and PatientFi on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.3M | $15M |
| Team size | 97 | 89 |
| Founded | 1981 | 2017 |
| HQ | Fort Washington, United States | Orange County, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
RAM Technologies at a glance
RAM Technologies generates $15.3M in revenue with 97 employees, headquartered in Fort Washington, United States.
- Revenue
- $15.3M
- Team size
- 97
- Founded
- 1981
Develops software to streamline operations and reduce administrative expense for health plans and other health care payers
PatientFi at a glance
PatientFi generates $15M in revenue with 89 employees, headquartered in Orange County, United States.
- Revenue
- $15M
- Team size
- 89
- Founded
- 2017
PatientFi® is a technology-based, point-of-sale financing company that partners with healthcare providers to offer patients a friendly payment solution for out-of-pocket medical and dental procedures. We serve a broad network of healthcare…
Other RAM Technologies alternatives
RAM Technologies competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
RAM Technologies vs PatientFi: frequently asked questions
Is RAM Technologies or PatientFi bigger?
RAM Technologies is the bigger company by revenue, at $15.3M against $15M for PatientFi.
How much revenue does RAM Technologies make?
RAM Technologies generates $15.3M in annual revenue with a team of 97.
How much revenue does PatientFi make?
PatientFi generates $15M in annual revenue with a team of 89.