PORT vs Track With Ease: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
PORT generates $298.5K in revenue; Track With Ease generates $330K. Track With Ease and PORT are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares PORT and Track With Ease on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $298.5K | $330K |
| Team size | 7 | 3 |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| HQ | Brighton, United Kingdom | United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
PORT at a glance
PORT generates $298.5K in revenue with 7 employees, headquartered in Brighton, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $298.5K
- Team size
- 7
- Founded
- 2015
Developer of a data management software designed to manage personal data. The company's software permits users ti take control of their data and connect with businesses, enabling businesses to comply with GDPR, protect and connect with…
Track With Ease at a glance
Track With Ease generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2017
Transaction management connecting clients, documents, and tasks in one place for the modern lawyer, broker, title, and mortgage professional.See everything together in one spot. Never waste time again searching for a file or a contact…
Other PORT alternatives
PORT competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
PORT vs Track With Ease: frequently asked questions
Is PORT or Track With Ease bigger?
Track With Ease is the bigger company by revenue, at $330K against $298.5K for PORT.
How much revenue does PORT make?
PORT generates $298.5K in annual revenue with a team of 7.
How much revenue does Track With Ease make?
Track With Ease generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.