JM Search vs ProcDNA: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
JM Search generates $83.7M in revenue; ProcDNA generates $85.8M. ProcDNA and JM Search are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares JM Search and ProcDNA on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  JM SearchThis company |  ProcDNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.7M | $85.8M |
| Team size | 290 | 331 |
| Founded | 1980 | 2019 |
| HQ | King of Prussia, United States | South San Francisco, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
JM Search at a glance
JM Search generates $83.7M in revenue with 290 employees, headquartered in King of Prussia, United States.
- Revenue
- $83.7M
- Team size
- 290
- Founded
- 1980
Executive search firm and advisor to CEOs, investors and boards of directors for recruiting, assessing and delivering transformational leadership teams
ProcDNA at a glance
ProcDNA generates $85.8M in revenue with 331 employees, headquartered in South San Francisco, United States.
- Revenue
- $85.8M
- Team size
- 331
- Founded
- 2019
ProcDNA is a consulting firm specializing in commercial analytics and technology, primarily serving the life sciences sector. They create game-changing Commercial Analytics and Technology solutions.
Other JM Search alternatives
JM Search competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
JM Search vs ProcDNA: frequently asked questions
Is JM Search or ProcDNA bigger?
ProcDNA is the bigger company by revenue, at $85.8M against $83.7M for JM Search.
How much revenue does JM Search make?
JM Search generates $83.7M in annual revenue with a team of 290.
How much revenue does ProcDNA make?
ProcDNA generates $85.8M in annual revenue with a team of 331.