Easy Field Services vs ProMaterial: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Easy Field Services generates $2.4M in revenue; ProMaterial generates $2.4M. Easy Field Services and ProMaterial are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Easy Field Services and ProMaterial on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Easy Field ServicesThis company |  ProMaterial |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.4M | $2.4M |
| Valuation | $14.4M | $16.5M |
| Team size | 3 | 5 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| HQ | Dallas, United States | Dusseldorf, Germany |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Easy Field Services at a glance
Easy Field Services generates $2.4M in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Dallas, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.4M
- Valuation
- $14.4M
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2018
Mobile Field Service Management Software
ProMaterial at a glance
ProMaterial generates $2.4M in revenue with 5 employees, headquartered in Dusseldorf, Germany.
- Revenue
- $2.4M
- Valuation
- $16.5M
- Team size
- 5
- Founded
- 2018
SaaS Network in ConstructionTech
Other Easy Field Services alternatives
Easy Field Services competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Easy Field Services vs ProMaterial: frequently asked questions
Is Easy Field Services or ProMaterial bigger?
Easy Field Services is the bigger company by revenue, at $2.4M against $2.4M for ProMaterial.
How much revenue does Easy Field Services make?
Easy Field Services generates $2.4M in annual revenue with a team of 3.
How much revenue does ProMaterial make?
ProMaterial generates $2.4M in annual revenue with a team of 5.