Latka logo

PushPro vs Referralyogi: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

PushPro generates $114K in revenue; Referralyogi generates $108.9K. PushPro and Referralyogi are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares PushPro and Referralyogi on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

PushPro vs Referralyogi compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyPushPro logoPushProThis companyReferralyogi logoReferralyogi
Revenue$114K$108.9K
ValuationNot disclosed$762.3K
CustomersNot disclosed125
Team size23
Founded20172018
HQNetherlandsChennai, India

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

PushPro logo

PushPro at a glance

PushPro generates $114K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Netherlands.

Revenue
$114K
Team size
2
Founded
2017

Unleash the power of direct customer engagement by sending unlimited Push Notifications straight from your website to ANY of your customers' devices. Even when they are not on your website. No native app nor personal information for your…

Referralyogi logo

Referralyogi at a glance

Referralyogi generates $108.9K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Chennai, India.

Revenue
$108.9K
Valuation
$762.3K
Customers
125
Team size
3
Founded
2018

Online Reputation Management for Local Businesses

Other PushPro alternatives

PushPro competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

PushPro vs Referralyogi: frequently asked questions

Is PushPro or Referralyogi bigger?

PushPro is the bigger company by revenue, at $114K against $108.9K for Referralyogi.

How much revenue does PushPro make?

PushPro generates $114K in annual revenue with a team of 2.

How much revenue does Referralyogi make?

Referralyogi generates $108.9K in annual revenue with a team of 3.