Latka logo

Paco App vs Rank Monitor: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Paco App generates $836.2K in revenue; Rank Monitor generates $839.3K. Rank Monitor and Paco App are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Paco App and Rank Monitor on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Paco App vs Rank Monitor compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyPaco App logoPaco AppThis companyRank Monitor logoRank Monitor
Revenue$836.2K$839.3K
Valuation$5.9MNot disclosed
Team size832
Founded20152015
HQBosques De Las Lomas, MexicoPorto Alegre, Brazil

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Paco App logo

Paco App at a glance

Paco App generates $836.2K in revenue with 8 employees, headquartered in Bosques De Las Lomas, Mexico.

Revenue
$836.2K
Valuation
$5.9M
Team size
8
Founded
2015

Paco is a mobile research platform that uses behavioral science to gather data and insights. It offers personalized app recommendations and is available for download on Android and iOS devices.

Rank Monitor logo

Rank Monitor at a glance

Rank Monitor generates $839.3K in revenue with 32 employees, headquartered in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Revenue
$839.3K
Team size
32
Founded
2015

Rank Monitor is a SERP Verifier for SEO Monitor keywords.

Other Paco App alternatives

Paco App competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Paco App vs Rank Monitor: frequently asked questions

Is Paco App or Rank Monitor bigger?

Rank Monitor is the bigger company by revenue, at $839.3K against $836.2K for Paco App.

How much revenue does Paco App make?

Paco App generates $836.2K in annual revenue with a team of 8.

How much revenue does Rank Monitor make?

Rank Monitor generates $839.3K in annual revenue with a team of 32.